27

Hi I wanted to know if anyone here is using Standard Notes (https://standardnotes.com/) as their daily driver for taking notes.

Is it fully open source (the server and the client)? How well does it work for note-taking?

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] harsh3466@lemmy.ml 7 points 19 hours ago

I looked at it and did some reading of others experiences, and it looked like a huge pain. I opted for Joplin and haven't looked back. I self host Joplin server for sync via docker and it's rock solid.

I love that the client is available on any platform. Is the client a little ugly, and clunky? Yes, but for me it's not so ugly and clunky that I'll give up a fully open source self hosted e2ee notes solution.

I've been self hosting Joplin in some form for something like six years. Once a year or so I scope out the other options and as of yet I haven't found another notes solution that I'm willing to switch to.

[-] kipo@lemm.ee 11 points 1 day ago

I did for a while but they made it such a pain to use it that way, so I ditched it and went back to Joplin.

For example, Standard notes was working fine, then one day an update broke my self-hosted setup. When I finally fixed it (it took days), I noticed the editors I used no longer worked either. I got tired of fixing and fighting to keep it working.

Joplin's editor sucks (on mac), but at least the app reliably stays working and syncing.

Joplin is a better way to go.

[-] node815@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

To add to this, I have tried Obsidian notes which is super highly recommended by many. I also have tried self hosting Bookstack for logging my notes etc.. But every time I tried it, nothing ever matched what I could do with Joplin which was exactly as what other said, rock solid and I have yet to run into any device which can't handle the client. I will say that the launch time on the one on my machine (Arch Linux) is a bit slow, but after it's launched, it's very easy to bring up and use as needed. :)

[-] TCB13@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Too bad the UI sucks and it doesn't have a WebUI.

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

The premise is to enable local-only storage. It's more secure. Joplin has backends for storing your contents securely elsewhere, and has transaction control, which is the same difference as a WebUI.

[-] wandermind@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago

I used to use Standard Notes for a while (didn't self-host the server) but for various reasons switched over to Joplin, syncing the data between devices with Syncthing.

[-] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

So i see that they have a premium version and that the code is gpl. So are the premium features in the repo? Can i make my own build that gives me the premium features free?

[-] mypasswordis1234@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

idk 🤷🏻‍♂️😳

[-] tiz@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

I remember hosting server option was somehow paid.

That’s somewhat my reason for I decided to go with Joplin

this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2024
27 points (100.0% liked)

Selfhosted

40767 readers
656 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS