386
“Accused of,” something everyone can see with their own eyes.
Well journalists can get sued and have to defend their wording, so this is a kind of wording that they cant get sued for.
TIL there are still people on twitter.
Xitter. Its poppin’!
It’s like a new age church. Tons of fragments all following a modern prophet.
Musk is a modern profit.
Cult, or...Qult.
Musk means a bit of each, but the ability to exploit others for his own gain takes priority.
Musk is only "America first" because it's the best place for his business.
He now essentially owns the government.
He has paid a shit ton for the election. He has government contracts.
Elon Musk is America.
When (some) people realise what Elon Musk actually is, what America actually is, they are gonna be disgusted (I know that there are a lot of people that already see this).
America should be awesome.
But it has sold out
Why does anyone have to accuse him of anything? He's not hiding what he's doing.
But MAH FREEZED PEACH!
TOWN SQUARE!
Something something argle bargle BIG TECH IS TOO WOKE and that's why Elon The Magnificent bought it!
"Free SpEeCh".... lol.
He revoked the blue brand label from their account.
Its literally digital class system.
- Top: the biggot himself
- his chosen (gifted) ones
- the suckers who pay
- Bottom: the poor and the disgraced (social censorship)
Everyone not on the platform doesn’t exist. (Technical censorship)
Do not question your god king or you will end your days as one of the poor, or worse you’ll be vanished.
He also canceled people's subscription to the targeted accounts and reduced the visibility of any account that gets blocked or muted by a number of accounts with larger follower counts.
It’s digital feudalism.
For President Musk, speech is free as long it agrees with him.
What's amusing is that I've seen Nazis on the 'net openly state that there will be "peace" if everyone bows to white supremacy and lets fascism rule, that is. They say the same thing about "free speech" - they demand free speech for all, mostly themselves, until they seize power. Then all speech must agree with their views....or else.
They openly admit this when they can hide behind nyms and so on. Very interesting how Elon's behavior on "free speech" more or less maps right onto this. Whines about "free speech" on Xitter before he owns it, then takes ownership, and exercises all kinds of censorship on those he disagrees with.
It's simple really. If it doesn't agree with him, that's not speech, that's just a barbarian's gibberish. So the free speech is clearly preserved. Clearly.
The only speech Musk believes should be free is his own. That is a remarkably consistent stance with nearly all other conservatives.
Imagine for a fucking moment that you declared yourself in favor of free speech while also dictating how others should identify themselves. Trans identification brought this to an absurdist level but conservatives have always been in favor of extremely stringent limits on self-expression.
The perpetual failing of the right is they all want to be authoritarians.
Obligatory "FREE SPEECH HUH???" comment
Which is exactly what some conservative said when his account was diverified.
These people don't realize that the same concentric cone of fascism that they loved and voted for just targeted them.
Free speech absolutist, huh? I think Elon got the words "absolutist" and "abolitionist" mixed up.
I love free speech. But sometimes it gets you punched in the face. Hopefully he gets punched.
Flatulist to the king
I'm just going to leave this here for anyone who wants to look at it.
So much for the tolerant left!
accused of censoring
When you post on x you make a gift to elon. It's no longer yours and he can do whatever he wants with it.
Yes, let them descend into chaos of infighting.
they still use xitter, that's the problem!
They know they will never get those followers back on a different platform.
this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2024
386 points (98.7% liked)
politics
19248 readers
2113 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS