85
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] heavydust@sh.itjust.works 46 points 6 days ago

open-source [...] a bunch of binary files

Please explain.

[-] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 25 points 5 days ago

the semiconductor industry desperately needs to collect expert information. Many aging experts are retiring and taking their knowledge with them

So let's feed their knowledge to a Large Language Model, instead of building a knowledge base.

[-] themoonisacheese@sh.itjust.works 35 points 6 days ago

That is without a doubt the single most stupid thing I've heard this entire week

[-] skeezix@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Why? I got my wife a SemiKong and she loves it.

[-] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 18 points 6 days ago

I love when it is clear that writer just copied and pasted a press release from a company with very little rewriting.

[-] Natanael@slrpnk.net 12 points 6 days ago

Automating hardware bugs, etc? An LLM is absolutely not the right tool for nanometer scale physics

[-] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Why do you say that?

I mean my intuition would tend to agree with you, but if it works... I could believe it.

So I'm just wondering why you would assert that this is a bad idea? What don't I know?

[-] CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee 6 points 6 days ago

SemiKong advertises a 20-30% reduction in time to market for new chip designs and a 20% improvement in first-time-right manufacturing scores.

Oh yeah? How is that accomplished when it can take a decade of development to get a new CPU out the door? Was this developed a decade ago?

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

You know there are simpler custom chips too right?

That said, it sounds a bit like bullshit to me too.

[-] CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee 2 points 5 days ago

Totally but if we're talking about simple custom chips, my point still stands as there is nothing to compare a custom chip to and the simplicity doesn't seem to necessitate a LLM to map out.

[-] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

That doesn't follow at all...

the simplicity doesn't seem to necessitate a LLM to map out.

So are you saying that if something is so simple that you could do it in a week, then it isn't worth using a tool that would get it done in 4 days?

I mean, no that doesn't necessitate use of a LLM. But by that logic, doing math never necessitates the use of a calculator, just do it on paper. Sure, you could...

[-] CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I'm saying there are simple and difficult chips to map out and the simple ones shouldn't need this by virtue of being simple.

Your analogy of using a computerized tool to complete a task doesn't really hold as the math you use a calculator for wouldn't be considered "simple math."

[-] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

No, the analogy is fine. If you have a task (math in the previous example) that takes some amount of time (doesn't matter how much), is it worth using a tool (calculator) that makes it faster?

That was the analogy.

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

I mean ... the kind of CPUs that take this much are probably unnecessary for many things. One can run quests, something like Doom, something like SW: Rebellion and SW: X-Wing Alliance on hardware from simpler times. One can also, surprisingly but not, do office tasks and listen to music on the same hardware. One can even render things like Babylon 5 computer-made parts on it. I would love to live in such a world. Also with modern processes and voltages such hardware could probably be insanely energy-efficient as compared to what we commonly use.

That said, I can understand machine generation and optimization of chip designs, and machine checking of them. Something they already do, I'm certain.

But what the hell would an LLM contribute there, seems unclear for me.

this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2024
85 points (82.4% liked)

Technology

60212 readers
3369 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS