348
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Summary

Elon Musk is reportedly staying at a $2,000-per-night cottage at Mar-a-Lago, just steps from Donald Trump’s main residence.

Musk moved in around Election Day, watched results with Trump, and left briefly around Christmas.

Concerns in Washington are growing over Musk’s influence on Trump, as he has participated in personnel meetings, foreign leader talks, and legislative interventions.

The close relationship between the two has drawn scrutiny, with Trump publicly praising Musk. Musk’s stay, accompanied by some of his children, highlights the billionaire’s deepening ties to Trump’s inner circle.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 154 points 1 week ago

Just right out into the open. This sort of blatant corruption would end careers back in the day.

[-] djsoren19@yiffit.net 10 points 6 days ago

It'd put people in jail back in the day.

Good thing rule of law has completely collapsed for everyone above a certain threshold of wealth, otherwise you could hope for consequences.

[-] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 4 points 6 days ago

The fact that it doesn't speak volumes about who really is in power.

[-] bfg9k@lemmy.world 65 points 1 week ago

Shame has become a meaningless word.

[-] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yes, the multi-decade propaganda machine of the right wing has been a roaring success.

That's why like 51% of the US voted for an sociopathic authoritarian oligarch, and the only other option was a pro-corporatocracy neoliberal.

[-] nimble@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 week ago

It doesn't change the meaning of your post but just a reminder that Trump got less than 50% of the popular vote.

[-] dirthawker0@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

And hypocrisy.

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 58 points 1 week ago

The number of Trump scandals that would have ended anyone else's career is mind boggling.

[-] LovingHippieCat@lemmy.world 66 points 1 week ago

If you pay attention to the Elon jet tracker this has been obvious for a bit. He's constantly flying to and from Mar-a-lago.

[-] ramsorge@discuss.online 46 points 1 week ago

I mean, we have a location.

[-] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 44 points 1 week ago

"I will call him... Mini-me"

[-] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago

I like this because it's unclear who's who in your eyes and it's obvious that both these megalomaniacs think its referring to the other

[-] HowAbt2morrow@futurology.today 7 points 1 week ago

Vance is like, “yo. Wtf, man?”

[-] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

Vance is Scott

[-] TriPolarBearz@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago
[-] ours@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

Dude really disappeared after making an ass of himself and when Musk in Chief came in.

[-] GeeDubHayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago

"I guess he doesn't want any CHOCOLATE! It's like catnip for clones!"

[-] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 43 points 1 week ago

Guaranteed he had more to do with the election than people are told

[-] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 51 points 1 week ago

He bought a social media company and made it blatantly political and then spent like $30million per month on just his donations to Trumps campaign.

I wouldn’t be surprised he did more than that.

[-] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

All that is why he should be stopped

[-] wildcardology@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

And who's going to do that?

[-] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

Someone less concerned about their own safety than their future

[-] Infynis@midwest.social 41 points 1 week ago

Oh my god, they were roommates

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

Just friends, dude

I'm genuinely surprised at the prevailing assumption that Musk's interests align with those of the general population.

Like if you hired actual experts to lead the DOGE thing they would be motivated to act in the interests of their employer (the government) because their future success would depend on their ability to do so.

Musk's future success is dependent on his ability to restructure government according to his own interests exclusively.

Case in point, the current visa fiasco. His position is very clearly aligned with his own interests.

I don't care who you voted for, this Musk thing is just bonkers.

[-] Dasus@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago

I'm genuinely surprised at the prevailing assumption that Musk's interests align with those of the general population.

Who on Earth is assuming that?

Everyone who isn't frothing at the mouth, apoplectic with rage at his involvement?

[-] bonanza@lemmynsfw.com 30 points 1 week ago

Are we suggesting a two birds, one stone situation?

[-] adarza@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago

2 guys 1 cup

[-] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago

Yeah Musk needs to put his side chick in check.

[-] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Return to office or be fired! Oh yeah I'm going to Florida, bye

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

Influence on donvict? Musk is the President and donvict is Musk's First Lady.

And if this broligarch is somehow thrown out as President and donvict needs a new sugar daddy(s), I suppose there is Thiel and Andreesen. And Vivek. Linda McMahon. Are the Mercers still around? What about the other members of the Paypal Mafia?

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

I wonder which smells worse. the main house or the cottage.

[-] Valorie12@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago

Trump probably smells worse because is constantly shitting himself. Musk probably smells bad because he never bathes.

[-] tomatolung@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago
[-] Dkarma@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago
[-] GeeDubHayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 week ago

I read this, and the Isaac Hayes/Chef voice that lives in the back of my head asked who's havin' butt sex?

[-] kablammy@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago

So Musk is doing a lot of cottaging around Trump?

[-] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago

Nuke it. We'd see if being a handful of radioactive ash bars one from being the president of the US of A.

[-] dmention7@lemm.ee 6 points 1 week ago

Aww, they are having a sleepover!

[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 6 points 1 week ago

Is he paying inflated rates?

[-] whostosay@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

He is paying the equivalent of you or I paying one cent for a years rent, maybe less.

It's trickling down so much I hope it stops soon.

Edit, I did the math, and it's exaggerated, but functionally the same sentence.

[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 1 points 6 days ago

It's going to be on the taxpayer dime, like the accommodations for the SS protecting the family. That's the point.

[-] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The math on this is actually worth sharing, because it really does get across the unbelievably staggering scale of his wealth.

A lot of people struggle to pay $2,000 a month in rent. Elon is paying that every day. And yet, if he stayed there for a hundred years, it would still only amount to 0.016% of his current estimated net worth ($465bn).

If you had $10,000 in your bank account, this would be the equivalent of you paying $1.50 for one hundred years of rent. Or, as you said, about one and a half cents per year.

The idea that anyone ever deserves to be that wealthy is beyond insane.

[-] whostosay@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Oooof, I did the math with 250B, I actually was not far off.

[-] Serinus@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Remember when Trump told his potential VP that they could run everything? Was that Pence, or was that pre-Pence?

[-] foggy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

gayyyyyyyy

(Only pouring gas in a fire 😉)

[-] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Vice President Trump?

[-] baggachipz@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

Kato Gaylin

this post was submitted on 31 Dec 2024
348 points (98.9% liked)

politics

19283 readers
1651 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS