345

Can one still claim that the USA is a liberal democracy? Where do you draw the line?

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] droporain@lemmynsfw.com 18 points 6 days ago

Oil company with an army...

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 14 points 6 days ago

Looks like you are a few years behind events.

[-] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 16 points 6 days ago

That was the case since the 80s

The people saying "always has been" have really short memories or've forgotten about the Roosevelt administrations.

There is a decent argument to be made that the USA is a de-facto oligarchy. However, it's a de-jure liberal democracy and Constitutional Republic for the time being.

[-] exploitedamerican@lemm.ee 6 points 5 days ago

Fdr was the exception to the rule. He pushed against the fascist oligarchs to prevent violent uprising of the proletariat.

"To prevent violent uprising of the proletariat" are you actively trying to phrase it to make it sound like even when someone does something good it was actually bad?

[-] exploitedamerican@lemm.ee 6 points 5 days ago

Not at all, i just think FDR was more complex than people make him out to be. He wasn't so much the savior of working class people as he was someone who placated both sides to achieve the best possible outcome. But given the vitriol he inspired from the wealthy its easy to see why he is still so revered by the struggling masses to this day.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 3 points 4 days ago

Sure you can. Until January 6th.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

It's at least a Soft Oligarchy yes. There's no legally or extra legally enforced class system. If you can make it into the upper classes, by guile, luck, or sheer bastardry they'll accept you and let you run some things, maybe even political offices. See J.D. Vance, a millennial from Appalachia who has risen to the Vice Presidency via guile and sheer bastardry.

But it's a Soft Oligarchy because opportunities are far from equal. Before anyone starts screeching, equality of outcome isn't an expectation here, merely equality of opportunity. In the large majority of cases your zip code can predict your future socioeconomic level. And not because rural areas are cheaper, that just means middle and upper class start at lower numbers there. Those classes are still not being obtained. Along with this are several studies over the last couple decades telling us that socioeconomic mobility is all but dead, both individually, and more recently, intergenerational mobility.

So while you aren't going to be killed or imprisoned for earning too much or asking for stuff above your station, it is very rare to access those levels without being born to them. Thus the "soft" in Soft Oligarchy.

[-] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 2 points 4 days ago

There's no legally or extra legally enforced class system.

Lol wat?

US has a strict class system. There is owner class and working class, they get treated differently under the law.

For example, look at how owners get taxed v how regular people get taxed. That's legally enforced class.

.D. Vance, a millennial from Appalachia who has risen to the Vice Presidency via guile and sheer bastardry.

Regime propaganda relies on these stories to justify the class system. Every generation gets a few of this class traitors so pedons can be told... You see loser, if you worked harder, daddy would reward you too! Now back on the planstation, start making daddy some mother fucking money.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

The tax system doesn't care where you came from. In a Hard Oligrachy it would. You would never escape the working class tax system or justice system and those systems would be designed to prevent you from changing classes, to the point of destroying anyone with the pretensions to try. The fact that you can access that other standard of treatment means the class system isn't enforced. If you want to say it's highly encouraged I would agree with you, but this isn't some conspiracy to have a couple winners that get highly propagandized, and there's no law against socioeconomic mobility.

Examples of Hard oligarchies are countries like Russia and Saudi Arabia. In Russia you will go out a window because someone powerful didn't like your competition and you have no protections; and in Saudi Arabia you will be arrested for pissing off the Royals.

The US is bad enough without exaggerating shit to make it seem like the worst. That leaves us unable to see what we might want to keep. Like the way the justice and healthcare systems treat rich people, we should all have that.

[-] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 1 points 4 days ago

You would never escape the working class tax system or justice system and those systems would be designed to prevent you from changing classes, to the point of destroying anyone with the pretensions to try

This is practically how it functions, working class rarely becomes owner class.

there's no law against socioeconomic mobility.

There is a set of laws that protect owners property, they get cash transfers from the government budgets, their legal entities get preferential tax treatment. Sure anyone can start business technically but capital is needed...

US increasingly doesn't have social mobility, you parents social rank correlates strongly with your own out comes.

In Russia you will go out a window because someone powerful didn't like your competition

Boeing milled its whistleblower, nothing happened.

Esptain committed "suicide"

JFK, mlk and malcom X got killed by the ruling class.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Blaze@sopuli.xyz 4 points 5 days ago

Feel free to crosspost to !AskUSA@discuss.online

if money = power then liberal (democracy) = oligarchy

[-] dullbananas@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 days ago

The closest thing we have to democracy is our ability to begin democracy by fighting against first-past-the-post voting systems

[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 days ago

The government controls all media. If they do not control one and it get big, it gets 'regulated' like TikTok or even banned. The general public will vote for the oligarchy as instructed.

it's very close to turning into one.

It's not quite there, but trump is definitely not one to shy away from it, so it mostly depends on who he appoints and interacts with. And how corrupt he will be.

[-] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I mean, no country truely had 10/10 democracy.

The US literally started out from people in chains, but eventually free the enslaved people (with the prison exemption), then black men could vote, then women.

Segregation was legal, then it it was outlawed.

Civil Right Act was passed

The level of racism began to deminish, not completely gone, but deminishing

I would say the US was at 1/10 democracy at the beginning, it was at 5/10 before trump, then it was at 4/10 right after Jan-6, now its at 4.25/10 (because some judicial appointments were made by biden as a counterbalance to republican judges).

Is it an oligarchy? Not really. I would say it's a democracy in which rich people have an advantage in money and influence. So I guess you could call it a semi-oligarchy. Because in a real oligarchy, the media would've been censored, and you wouldn't be seeing my comment, you wouldn't be able to ask such question, there'd be no free(ish) internet access. There's be no somewhat protected union activity. There's be no somewhat protected protests. There are often violations to those rights, but back then, it was way worse.

We never really had a true 10/10 democracy, but as time goes on, it tends to trend toward becoming more democratic. (We'll see what happens with Project 2025. Could be just another period of recession as it has happened many times throughout US history, or it could be Weimar 1933, only time will tell)

[-] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 6 days ago

I'm here hoping to any god that is watching that Project 2025 becomes something like a dog catching the car situation. The Republicans are the dogs and now they are arguing amongst themselves what to do with the car.

I'm planning as if Project 2025 goes forward. If civil war is in my lifetime, the shots will start with the alt-right.

There is a quote that's been ringing through my head ever since the CEO murder: "Those who make peaceful reform impossible make violent revolution inevitable."

The Republicans have made any meaningful reform impossible through half-assed negotiations, bad faith arguments, and "fEeLiNgS pOlItIcS" over the last 50 years.

Democrats like AOC and politicians like Bernie are the acute minority. The DNC has moved more toward the right and given workers the middle finger.

Almost every regulatory body has been captured. The overturn of the Chevron doctrine made the rest completely powerless. We now have a fucking lunatic whispering into Trump's ear to remove accident reporting requirements for his shitty cars. We will have an anti-vaxer running the CDC, a supplement pushing hack running Medicare, and a man who overpaid for Twitter running the fucking "Department of Government Efficacy."

This is the tip of the iceberg. They aren't even in office yet and they are already stirring shit.

[-] hendrik@palaver.p3x.de 10 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Agree. Though the felt level of democracy and freedom seems pretty low. A lot of people feel disadvantaged. People are getting ripped off for example with healthcare payments by the (rich) establishment. I hear a lot of complaints here for example you absolutely need a VPN because all internet service providers spy on you. There seems always to be a choice, but a fake one. In the end, it's all the same and you can't really choosse anything but the label that gets slapped on. Same for the politicians. You have like 2 candidates to vote for. Probably neither of those does you any good. And they're both part of the oligarchy and they put in quite some effort to not offer you any third option.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 01 Jan 2025
345 points (95.3% liked)

No Stupid Questions

36278 readers
950 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS