33
What is "forming questions in an affirmative voice?" (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 day ago by j4k3@lemmy.world to c/nostupidquestions@lemmy.world
10 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I was watching an upload by Prompt Engineering on the SmolAgents agentic rag project. In it they talk about the importance of forming questions in the same affirmative voice that the LLM will respond with. My understanding is fuzzy here. Language is not my strongest subject. So maybe ELI5 please. What is "asking questions in an affirmative voice," and more importantly, what is it in contrast to other forms of voicing?

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

'Affirmative Voice' is not really a thing, as far as codified English grammar goes.

They may mean active voice:

Active Voice: The soldiers shot the man.

Passive Voice: The man was injured by the soldiers's gunfire.

Or they may mean to simply be affirmative, as in, polite, reassuring, informative, non-confrontational, etc?

Or, if you take 'voice' to be the more technical definition within the realm of phonetics, they could mean that you should be pronouncing consonants and vowels in a manner that they personally find affirmative...?

Anyone who is telling you to 'use an affirmative voice' is ironically being vague and not really demonstrating a great understanding of English themselves.

It would be less confusing if they said something along the lines of 'phrase your questions in a non-hostile, affirmative manner.'

English does not have a formally defined 'affirmative voice' the way that it does with 'active voice', 'passive voice', 'reflexive voice', 'reciprocal voice', etc.

[-] jbrains@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

Forget "affirmative voice" for a moment, since that seems to be tripping others up as well as you. Prompt Engineering suggest sounding like the LLM, asking questions with "the same voice" as the one the LLM uses to respond. Perhaps PE needs to clarify this with some examples, because calling it "affirmative voice" hasn't seemed to make it clear enough.

I suggest asking them, then perhaps sharing what you learn for the benefit of other folks who are similarly confused.

The only interpretation that comes to my mind is avoiding "not" and "don't". Ask for what you want instead of what you don't want. 🤷 That's just a guess.

[-] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The difference would be "How do you think we can prevent this in the future?" Vs "What the fuck were you thinking?!?"

Both questions are trying to figure out what went wrong, but one of them is more pleasant.

[-] lurch@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

Honestly, I know what the intention was, but the first makes me feel manipulated and angry right away, as it implies I want to prevent anything and that there is a future. It's so unnatural and loaded.

[-] callouscomic@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

That sounds like more of a personal hangup than standard fact for anyone.

[-] BassTurd@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

I think this example is used in the context that something preventable happened. You're more likely to get a better response if asking in the former than the latter.

[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

The first is problem solving, the second is blaming.

The first is phrased in a way that is condescending for an adult.

[-] BassTurd@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

I didn't think I agree that it's condescending. To me it's just your cause analysis. If I had people reporting to me, and someone fucked up, I would want to know how we're going to prevent it from happening again. To me it's just cutting to the chase and problem solving.

[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

I didn’t think I agree that it’s condescending.

The context is whether the person asking the question was involved in the process that went wrong and if the person who screwed up should know better. We are probably thinking of different situations, like how 'bless your heart' can be positive or negative depending on context.

If one person screwed up, saying 'we' comes across as patronizing because it generally means the person asking knew how to avoid the situation and expected the person who screwed up to know as well. Like if someone didn't disconnect the power to a thing like they are supposed to because they were in a hurry and shocked themselves, saying 'what should we do next time' would be condescending. That would be very different than discovering a new fault in a group process and asking a team (adults) what should be done next time. "We found out that the plan to handle case Y didn't work, how do you think we can prevent it next time" is not condescending because it is being asked to a group of adults (plural) for something new. "How do you think it can be avoided" would also not be condescending if asked for a single person.

It sounds nitpicky, but it is really nuance. Saying 'we' when the right thing is known is condescending for adults, but makes it easier for children who are learning to not take it so personally.

[-] BassTurd@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

I definitely agree, it's all contextual. I worked in manufacturing for almost a decade which is very much process based. If something went wrong, we needed to know why so that it could be prevented.

A lot of the work I've done has been project based, and I usually think of the people involved as the team. Unless there's an outlier, the general successes and failures are team wins and losses. These sort of questions obviously aren't for all situations, but when used properly, it can bring about engagement. Even from critics, at least when given the floor to speak, they may reveal some truths that need addressing.

I have talked like this to children, which is good for them, but also condescendingly when I've felt it was warranted. I like to think in this situation it was a 'moment to grow' situation rather than condescension.

this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2025
33 points (97.1% liked)

No Stupid Questions

36278 readers
876 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)

Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.

Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.

Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.

Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.

Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.

Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.

Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.

Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.

Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
ja2@lemmy.world
_MoveSwiftly@lemmy.world
Rooki@lemmy.world
Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world
automodbeta@lemmy.world
L3s@lemmy.world