172
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] beansbeansbeans@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

I really don't care, do u?

Just don't watch garbage.

[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Yeah, I do, because this isn't about the continued enshitification of streaming services and shitty shows, it's about blatant corruption.

[-] simplejack@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

To be fair, Prime Video was always going to suck. It’s a perk to get you to subscribe to retail service. The goal is and will always be, “how can I get these people to buy stuff from Amazon.”

[-] beansbeansbeans@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

I was using the infamous jacket question.

I agree, we need to call out corruption. We can also ignore their propaganda. There's nothing in this documentary worth listening to; it's just another money grab.

[-] FoxyFerengi@lemm.ee 78 points 1 day ago

I can't think of a less interesting documentary than Trophy Wife #3

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago
[-] errer@lemmy.world -4 points 1 day ago

This comment is missing the letter t or a comma. Not sure which is worse…

Check your style books. This is in response to something, so no comma needed when referring to a previously known subject.

[-] itsonlygeorge@reddthat.com 12 points 1 day ago

I’ll take “Conflict of Interest” for $200, Alex.

[-] WatDabney@fedia.io 48 points 1 day ago

All the billionaires are lining up to swear their fealty and get a slice of the oligarch pie.

[-] madjo@feddit.nl 12 points 1 day ago

Stop buying from Bezos

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 26 points 1 day ago

The financial grift begins. It never ended. But steroids again.

[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago
[-] BigLime@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago

I'll save you some time and brain cells and tell you to check this book out...

https://biblioreads.eu.org/book/show/30509965-from-the-removed-house-to-the-white-house

[-] kautau@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

.ml filters removed some word in your link

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Wow...truly pathetic

[-] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I did some searching. The word might be "whore" (second listing):

https://biblioreads.eu.org/search/House%20to%20white%20house

[-] BigLime@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

Yeah that checks out

[-] tja@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

I mean, the link is still working since only the number in the URL is important. So you can just click on the link and see the full title

[-] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Oh geez. I didn't realize it still worked. I assumed it to be broken, seeing the partial title underline and all. Thanks for the tip!

this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2025
172 points (95.7% liked)

politics

19283 readers
2369 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS