536
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 5 hours ago

because it's not google we're gonna make it look exactly like google

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

With Net Neutrality gone, these giant tech companies could start bidding to make ISPs make their search engine default and have the other competitors fail to load.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] qevlarr@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago
[-] LiveLM@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago

And just when I thought their endless begging couldn't get any more pathetic.
Soon enough they'll tell you a puppy dies every time you launch a non-edge browser

[-] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 18 hours ago

If you’re going to use one of the two, it’s a lot better to be using Bing than Google. At least you stand a chance of finding what you’re looking for with Bing.

[-] LiveLM@lemmy.zip 1 points 17 hours ago

I guess? But deception ain't helping anyone

[-] selokichtli@lemmy.ml 4 points 22 hours ago

Don't worry, "the mushroom will eat the fungus". It may be the other way around, but whatever.

[-] FundMECFS@slrpnk.net 155 points 1 day ago

Kind of fucked up but tbf Google does similarly shady stuff.

Please just use duckduckgo (or SearX).

[-] gregor@gregtech.eu 45 points 1 day ago

I host my own SearXNG instance, which miiiight be a bit of a bad idea because the anonymity of the crowd disappears but hosting your own services is way too cool to ignore. It's at search.gregtech.eu in case anyone wants to use it.

[-] nef@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 day ago

This is nothing like GregTech! Where's the tedious microcrafting to enjoy before every search?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (25 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 66 points 1 day ago

lol the gall

[-] Mwa@lemm.ee 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Besides Privacy DDG is wayy better then Google And Bing + It has a better search quality.

[-] toynbee@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

I prefer DDG to either as well, but in terms of search quality ... Don't they use Bing search results?

[-] Mwa@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago

Yes they use Bing but i think they did some adjustments to improve the search quality (Correct me if am wrong)

[-] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

DDG may be better for privacy, but I've found their search results to be garbage.

[-] twei@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 day ago

Make sure you have regional results enabled if you're not from the US, results get way better (just make sure the little toggle right below the search bar is on)

[-] Mwa@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

It shows less results but i find it to be better personally.

I don't think there's a difference in search quality, but I do really like the bangs and the client-side settings (can completely disable the AI noise, enable dark mode, etc all w/o needing an account).

[-] Mwa@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago
[-] conartistpanda@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

I disagree with the quality part.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 59 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Usual Microsoft, using shady tactics instead of creating a better product or just focusing on their own thing and respecting user choice. They should grow up sometime.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

This is a genius move to keep you from Google search

Seems more like a genius move to get slapped with another antitrust-like lawsuit.

[-] Feelfold@lemm.ee 10 points 1 day ago

Corps don't give a fuck about an antitrust law suit. In the US, the party that pays the most to jerk off CEOs just got put in charge. Even if it was the other party, who only pays slightly less, the most extreme fines are a slap on the wrist. Hell, come Jam 20th it'll probably a tax write off.

Until the EU levies fines that would kneecap these companies out of business, there is no incentive to change the behavior.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz 78 points 1 day ago

Microsoft does so many scammy things when it comes to trying to prevent people from using Chrome/Google. Even though Edge/Bing hasn't caught on, I really think them abusing windows dominate OS position this way should be enough for an antitrust lawsuit.

[-] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 42 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Not just Google. There was a performance "bug" in Windows Defender a while back that specifically harmed Firefox. It had been reported but Microsoft took 5+ years to fix, and Mozilla did the bulk of the sleuthing and proposing fixes themselves.

Now, whether MS were intentionally crippling a competitor's browser in the beginning when the bug surfaced (which coincidentally was around the time Edge was relaunched as a chromium browser), there's no way to know.

But after a certain point, a software company with a market cap in the trillions loses any benefit of doubt I'd give them in scenarios like this where it benefits them not to find a solution. And 5 years is far beyond that point.

Unfortunately for Firefox, they didn't really have the money for a lawsuit against a juggernaut like Microsoft.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Breve@pawb.social 51 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

User: "Can we get Google?"

Microsoft: "But we already have Google at home!"

The Google at home: [reskinned Bing page]

[-] const_void@lemmy.ml 27 points 1 day ago

Bing/Microsoft are so scummy lately

[-] pupbiru@aussie.zone 2 points 17 hours ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

which has become a synonym for search engines or finding answers online.

If you’re my age, sure. But it’s crap.

[-] Rinox@feddit.it 5 points 1 day ago

Wait, is Microsoft using Google's copyrighted work on their page without authorization? This is going to get pulled so fast they're gonna get whiplash.

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Why would they? They can imitate Google's style w/o violating their copyright, it would actually be easier to reinvent the wheel than to try to somehow copy what Google has. It's nothing special, just a bit of padding and margin settings for result cards and whatnot.

[-] Syd@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago

Yeah this "Microsoft" group seems to be pretty established and it looks like they have decent resources.

And probably a lawyer or two to look things over.

[-] xia@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 day ago

I wonder if Google would even bother to do the reverse. Is anyone searching for bing?

[-] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 18 hours ago

Google has such bad results, they would probably figure you wanted the Palmer’s candy.

[-] Jimmycakes@lemmy.world -3 points 16 hours ago
[-] dantheclamman@lemmy.world 8 points 15 hours ago

It's my right to say it's shitty behavior and I look down on it

[-] Jimmycakes@lemmy.world -3 points 11 hours ago

No one is saying you can't?? Lmao. Needed to get your daily persecution fix did ya. Enjoy it little buddy

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2025
536 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

60301 readers
3088 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS