159

as if you needed more reasons to switch to Signal

top 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 67 points 2 days ago

You're telling me the messaging serving with a roll-your-own encryption that hasn't been audited and doesn't enable end-to-end-encryption by default, instead requiring you to initiate 1-to-1 "secret chats" isn't secure or trustworthy?? Holy balls!

why people don't use matrix is beyond me

[-] theangriestbird@beehaw.org 2 points 1 day ago

open stuff scares people. plus with messengers, we're kind of bound to what our friends use. I've been slowly converting friends to Signal, and but people are very reluctant to change when the thing they have already works. Can't imagine how much friction I would hit with something like matrix.

[-] calmluck9349@infosec.pub 1 points 8 hours ago

How slow friends are blows my mind. Like a cool new app they is secure and private?! Who wouldn't jump on that?! I tell everyone" I don't do SMS. Signal is the only way to get a hold of me. If you have a more secure app I'll look into it. "

[-] zephorah@lemm.ee 37 points 2 days ago

Proton up people. And get your people on Signal or WIRE.

We’re probably the most boring people day to day and we’ve dove it for a while on general principle. Now, it feels important to have already made that shift.

[-] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 2 days ago

also XMPP and Matrix/Element.

Also your choices should be impacted by your threat model. Not everyone needs to lock up like they're James Bond.

[-] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 10 points 2 days ago
[-] drwho@beehaw.org 5 points 2 days ago
[-] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 5 points 2 days ago
[-] drwho@beehaw.org 2 points 1 day ago
[-] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 2 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

unable to decrypt message
unable to decrypt message
unable to decrypt message

[-] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 10 points 2 days ago

I have two friends on Signal!

No one else believes me. Gonna be a weird future

[-] DdCno1@beehaw.org 2 points 2 days ago

I managed to get my entire family onto this service and even some friends. That said, they are almost all also using at least WhatsApp, because they are only using Signal to stay in touch with me (since I'm not on WhatsApp).

[-] quaff@lemmy.ca 41 points 2 days ago

I can’t believe it! 😱

/s

[-] einkorn@feddit.org 17 points 2 days ago

I am shocked I tell you! Shocked!

[-] SteevyT@beehaw.org 8 points 2 days ago

Well, not that shocked.

[-] Mikina@programming.dev 23 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I'm a fan of self-hosted Matrix server. You can get a dozen of bridges for those stubborn people that refuse to leave messenger/whatsapp/telegram (at a loss of encryption, and they still get your convos, but at least you don't have their spyware on your mobile and you can have everything in one app), while also being decentralized.

Self-hosting a server is actually really, really easy. It took me like half an hour, because there is an amazing Matrix Ansible Deploy script, that has a pretty easy to follow documentation, and is also one of those super-rare projects that just works. Even if I forgot to update my server for several months, I could literally "just update", and the script is clever enough to figure out what changed, tell me what I need to update in the config files (which are still only like four rows of stuff I needed to setup), and it is a really smooth experience. Even when you want to set up some bridges, for most it's literally just adding "_bridge_enabled: true" to the ansible yml config file. I've already set up Telegram, WhatsApp, Discord and Messenger this way, and it was effortless.

[-] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 8 points 2 days ago
[-] haverholm@kbin.earth 3 points 2 days ago

I've used matrix for the better part of a decade, and I get that reference.

That said, while the matrix crew have worked hard on the decryption issues, I'd much rather feel that particular pain on a federated network where I can change servers than be stuck with Signal if/when the single server's policies turn evil.

[-] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 1 points 2 days ago

What do you do when you get that message.

Ive lost contact with friends because of that message. They just can't read anything I send them anymore.

[-] haverholm@kbin.earth 1 points 2 days ago

I verify my sessions. its a hassle, but it's getting rarer and easier.

[-] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 1 points 1 day ago

My contacts said they did verify their sessions. I never understand why this happens or how to fix it

[-] stinky@redlemmy.com 2 points 2 days ago

Impressive!

What is that?

What problem does it solve

[-] white_nrdy@programming.dev 5 points 2 days ago

Matrix is a new-ish decentralized, private, E2EE encryption protocol. It's pretty neat. It still has some issues (at least that I experience. Mainly the Android app is constantly being super slow to receive messages), but it's super promising.

They also have some goals to improve email infrastructure by integrating the matrix protocol, but not sure if that will go anywhere. I remember reading this off hand remark on their blog. Can't find the source.

As the original comment said, there's the concept ifa "bridge" which allows you to bridge other services to a matrix chat. So you could have a discord channel and matrix room bridged, as an example. A ready to go option with bridges is Beeper. But you can also setup your own stuff, as they said.

[-] stinky@redlemmy.com 1 points 2 days ago

If I give my Discord chats to Beeper, and authorities subpoena Beeper, will the authorities get my Discord chats?

[-] timestatic@feddit.org 2 points 2 days ago

Yes they would. Thats why Beeper is working on changing to a bridge setup that works client-side and not server-side. Remember, that Discord is not encrypted and authorities can just get your data from discord directly. Do not use discord in any sort of private context whatsoever. I don't believe Discord itself isn't actively using my messaging data anyways

[-] Mikina@programming.dev 1 points 2 days ago

It works simillarly to an IRC. You have a server, that server can have channels, I think it can even do voice. But, unlike IRC, you can also use your server to talk to people on other servers, similar to how Fediverse works - if I have a server hosted on myserver.com, and someone else has a public room on server otherserver.com, I can either join the room@otherserver.com or message person@otherserver.com, all from my account on myserver.com.

And bridges are basically just bots that run on your own server, and by scraping websites/using API of the service your bridging they create a private room i.e Messenger@myserver.com, with subrooms per chat, and the bot then sends every message it recieves signed into your messenger account to the room, and vice versa - anything you send there will it forward to the real messenger, basically allowing you to chat with people on messenger through your matrix server. Which solves the problem of "Each of my friend is using different messaging service, can I have them all in one app? (The app being Matrix client)".

[-] stinky@redlemmy.com 1 points 2 days ago

wonderful! thank you

[-] lazynooblet@lazysoci.al 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I read that all the popular chat services provide similar information to law enforcement agencies. I don't think telegram is special in this regard.

Edit: https://www.malwarebytes.com/blog/news/2021/12/heres-what-data-the-fbi-can-get-from-whatsapp-imessage-signal-telegram-and-more

[-] theangriestbird@beehaw.org 4 points 2 days ago

I'm generally given to trust Malwarebytes regarding cybersecurity, but they don't mention at all that E2E encryption is not the default messaging style on Telegram. That, plus the article being from 2021, makes me distrustful of that source.

Signal is still the only service I am aware of that does not store logs of user messages on servers. Messages only exist on the devices of individual users.

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago

If it’s stored on their servers then it isn’t private

[-] drwho@beehaw.org 3 points 2 days ago

Here we go again. Once more, folks don't fucking listen when they're warned. And the ones who should have listened just got branched again.

[-] gregs_gumption@lemm.ee 8 points 2 days ago

A perfect example of why SimpleX is a great choice for messaging

[-] HappyTimeHarry@lemm.ee 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Isn't simplex also funded by venture capitalists like Jack Dorsey? I don't think I'd trust then not to sell out users when it comes time to pay back the investors.

[-] tisktisk@piefed.social 11 points 2 days ago

Dorsey, Zuck, Bill Gates. All the venture capital interests already got they teeth in Simplex Chat.

[-] Umbrias@beehaw.org 1 points 1 day ago

i would love an analysis of their federation because it seems built to make that impossible.

[-] toothpicks@beehaw.org 1 points 2 days ago

Herpes simplex?

[-] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 5 points 2 days ago

Well this was always coming!

[-] mox@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 days ago
this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2025
159 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37830 readers
287 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS