133

Summary

As Donald Trump prepares for his second term, early indications suggest a far more extreme presidency than his first.

Despite muted resistance and attempts to normalize his return, Trump’s recent erratic Mar-a-Lago press conference signals an alarming shift.

He floated aggressive expansionist ideas, including annexing Greenland and the Panama Canal, while making bizarre remarks on January 6, domestic appliances, and windmills.

Critics warn Trump 2.0 may escalate his provocations to new levels, consolidating power and wealth, as concerns over his unpredictability and global destabilization grow.

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 10 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)
[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 46 minutes ago

It will help distract the magoos that voted for this dumbass. They can be "proud" of some performative bullshit, and that plus the likes of Faux "News" no longer screeching about egg prices will mollify the stupid.

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Trump is a master at misdirection, though. He floods the zone with bullshit, on purpose, so the media keeps talking about the crazy shit he says, and not the actual things he does. He won't do all of the things he talks about, but he can do any individual thing that he wants to. He is hoping to get away with things while we all chatter about the crazy shit he says.

So now that the election is over and we know we have to tolerate four more years of it, we are better off keeping any public resistance under the radar until he actually takes actions while in office, and prioritize responding to what he does over what he says.

[-] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 38 points 1 day ago

Ah yes, the American experiment: "can the president destroy the country?"

[-] Earflap@reddthat.com 12 points 1 day ago

Its a good question though. Does any of this shit actually work or are we all blowing ourselves?

[-] thefartographer@lemm.ee 11 points 1 day ago

😢 Y'all are getting to blow yourselves? The only I get to blow is questionable food choices out my ass

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Username checks out

[-] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

NPR gonna be droning the hegemonic narrative peacefully through the apocalypse.

this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2025
133 points (97.8% liked)

politics

19292 readers
1698 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS