984
submitted 20 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) by The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world to c/gaming@lemmy.world
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 10 hours ago

Eat shit and die motherfucker

Ubisoft Executives need to get comfortable not eating food anymore.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 7 points 8 hours ago

It feels tragic. On the one hand, they made some of my most favourite games especially the Splinter Cell series, and it would be sad to see a once great developer to go. But then on the other, the greedy bastards deserve to go under for ruining some of my most favourite games including the Splinter Cell series.

But seriously though, if Ubisoft do go under, I hope that their IP would go into safe hands, like how Baldur's Gate franchise has been handed over from Bioware to the competent team of Larian (and I do hope Larian does not enshittify unlike the fate of other companies, such as Ubisoft and EA).

[-] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 9 points 8 hours ago

Larian isn't making another Baldur's Gate.

[-] LandedGentry@lemmy.zip 4 points 8 hours ago

It’s funny how many times they’ve clearly stated it too lol

[-] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 5 points 7 hours ago

The best thing about it is that they're not making another BG just because they don't want to. I think it is safe to say say that they won't enshitify as long as Swen Vincke is at the helm.

[-] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 3 points 7 hours ago

They were decent to the Anno series, but honestly that's probably just because they didn't see the value in messing with the formula that Anno solidified around the time of the acquisition and it reliably boosts their numbers with strategy gamers who otherwise might not be customers of Ubisoft's at all

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] lemmy_get_my_coat@lemmy.world 22 points 11 hours ago

You love to see it

[-] Rooty@lemmy.world 90 points 14 hours ago

"Company fails to generate infinite revenue even after implementing every abusive tactic known".

[-] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 11 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Imagine, about five years ago, they peaked at $82.

It was also during that time when they talked about getting into Crypto, NFTs, and all sorts of other get rich quick schemes.

Now look at them.

[-] kameecoding@lemmy.world 50 points 14 hours ago

More like, company keeps pushing for short-term profits, runs out of goodwill built up in the past.

[-] Aurix@lemmy.world 10 points 10 hours ago

Ubisoft had many long standing issues, but disowning The Crew users was the worst possible move they could have made in their already dire situation.

[-] CaptKoala@lemmy.ml 9 points 8 hours ago

I played and enjoyed both of them, shutting down the first one instead of giving it offline functionality really pissed me off and was the final straw for me with Ubi. It had a fully offline playable story, NPC vehicles to race etc. and the game would've been preserved forever.

Instead we got the crew 2, always online AAA signature garbage.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] notannpc@lemmy.world 30 points 12 hours ago

Part of me is sad because some of my favorite games might get shitcanned as a result, but it’s a loss I’m willing to accept if it kills such a parasitic company.

[-] LotrOrc@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

I'll be sad if For Honor stops being supported

[-] PunnyName@lemmy.world 28 points 13 hours ago
[-] CaptKoala@lemmy.ml 4 points 9 hours ago

Came here to say this.

[-] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 5 points 9 hours ago

Ubisoft always reminds me of an old pun my Latin teacher taught us: Semper ubi sub ubi. Always where under where.

[-] all4one@lemmy.zip 2 points 8 hours ago

Semper ubi sub ubisoft

[-] skozzii@lemmy.ca 62 points 15 hours ago

Ubisoft executives need to become comfortable with "not being employed."

[-] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 51 points 14 hours ago

Unfortunately, that's not how this works.

This is late stage capitalism, execs are judged on how much money they managed to squeeze out before the company died. They'll be hired immediately specifically to do it again somewhere else.

The company dying in incidental.

[-] kameecoding@lemmy.world 12 points 14 hours ago

Some will take the blame, take millions as parachute payments, then the low level workers will have their jobs cut.

[-] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 112 points 16 hours ago

Literally all they had to do was make good games

[-] lobut@lemmy.ca 35 points 14 hours ago

Not sure what you mean. They needed more NFTs and AI from what I can tell! /s

Honestly though whenever I hear big companies like this fail, it keeps making me go back to the Steve Jobs interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NlBjNmXvqIM

[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 5 points 9 hours ago

How have I never seen that interview!? Thanks, great stuff...

[-] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 4 points 7 hours ago

It's funny it happened to Apple too

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] ToucheGoodSir@lemy.lol 84 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

they MBA'd themselves into extinction

edit; everyone with an mba is only qualified to be a farm laborer

[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 22 points 12 hours ago

Farm labor is complicated and specialized.

[-] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 11 points 9 hours ago

And fucking physically hard

[-] The_v@lemmy.world 69 points 16 hours ago

Hey now, I know a bunch of farm laborers and started out as one myself.

They are nowhere near qualified for farm labor. That requires being able to work, not just regurgitate platitudes from the most recent bullshit management fad.

[-] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 35 points 15 hours ago

Management will destroy this world.

[-] Soup@lemmy.world 29 points 14 hours ago

There’s a world where management is treated as an important but not godly position. Where they are schedulers and arbitrators of conflict, and where they aren’t free from consequences because they’re already at the top. And holy hell it’s also not the place where the position is used to promote someone out of where they’re useful simply because paying a labourer more than a manager is seen as unthinkable. It ain’t this one, but I like to think about it sometimes.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 253 points 19 hours ago

You're right Ubisoft, I am pretty comfortable not owning your games 🥰

load more comments (18 replies)
[-] Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net 19 points 14 hours ago

They need to get comfortable with losing their company.

[-] HexesofVexes@lemmy.world 83 points 17 hours ago

I guess shareholders got used to not owning their stock?

[-] AGD4@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago

FFS just get Olden Era released and then go die in a corner somewhere, Ubisoft.

[-] Jrockwar@feddit.uk 62 points 17 hours ago

It's because they're not AAA anymore. They went AAAA so I guess they've had a financial rating overflow and now they've gone negative.

[-] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 39 points 17 hours ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Thcdenton@lemmy.world 37 points 16 hours ago

Get rid of uplay. I might buy ubisoft games if they weren't tied to that horrible service

[-] CatZoomies@lemmy.world 25 points 15 hours ago

Not just Uplay, but also their activation servers. Their games make calls to their endpoints to authenticate if you own/access the game and DLC. If those activation servers are decommissioned without a replacement, your game won’t activate and you’ll lose access to DLC.

They announced they would do this for legacy games several years ago, and I was going to lose access to all the DLC I paid for with my Splinter Cell Blacklist game that I physically owned on a Wii U disc way back in 2013. Bought all the DLC because I loved the game. After enough gamer backlash, Ubisoft backpedaled and the activation servers remain for now. However, the concern is still there that I’ll lose the stuff I paid for when they decide they can’t serve it anymore or if they go bankrupt. Without them updating the game code or open sourcing it, I lose updates, DLC, etc.

We need digital ownership reform, or else it’s piracy time again. This will especially be critical when Gabe steps down from Steam and new owners are appointed, or if Steam goes public.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 40 points 16 hours ago

Ubisoft just needs to get comfortable with no longer owning their games. 😈

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2025
984 points (98.8% liked)

Gaming

3313 readers
1662 users here now

!gaming is a community for gaming noobs through gaming aficionados. Unlike !games, we don’t take ourselves quite as serious. Shitposts and memes are welcome.

Our Rules:

1. Keep it civil.


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only.


2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry.


I should not need to explain this one.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month.


Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.



Logo uses joystick by liftarn

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS