56
all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 year ago

Mac OS: Cat, Dog, Cow, Panther, Some California park, your uncles house

[-] d_k_bo@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago

I'll likely call it 6.0 since I'm starting to worry about getting confused by big numbers again.

~ Linus Torvalds

[-] pete_the_cat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I was looking a Linus/Linux comment, I was trying to remember at what point Linus said "I'm incrementing the major version because these numbers are getting too big, there is no major advancement".

[-] Walop@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 year ago
[-] gon@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

ill be downloading this image thank you very much

[-] lontong@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago
[-] FluffyPotato@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Even stranger is the windows 8 and 8.1 part since this is the one and only time a service pack changed the name of the OS.

[-] tram1@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

41>10>5

GNOME is clearly the best

[-] mlg@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

"It's 34 versions ahead of cinnamon" -GNOME devs probably

[-] LaggyKar@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

And there is OpenSUSE: 10 11 12 13 42 15

[-] MartinXYZ@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

If 42 is a true to Sir Terry Pratchett, then I see anothing wrong with this.

[-] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Douglas adams.

Your geek credentials have been invalidated, sir please exit the internet immediately.

[-] MartinXYZ@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Fuck. I know. I just woke up and haven't had any coffee yet.

[-] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

The system for tumbleweed is nice. There's only one version : tumbleweed.

[-] LaggyKar@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

From another perspective, you have a new version every few days, with the date as the version

[-] const_void@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Juking the version number was trendy there for a while. It happened to browser versions to. Firefox and Chrome went from like version 10 to 100.

[-] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

By 2024 firefox will be on version 1043^624^x*12^69 where x is the latest version of chrome.

[-] zephyr@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[-] NULL@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago

Because KDE is boring. /s

[-] mindbleach@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

See also the Doom numbering system: Ultimate, 2, 64, Final, 3, (2016), Eternal.

[-] hemko@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

64 came after final, at least according to wikipedia

[-] Dnn@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago
[-] Hildegarde@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

NT was a parallel line of "professional" windows. It had a different kernel or something. There were equivalent versions to most of the home releases.

The first release was NT 3.1, to match version numbers with the home OS.

NT 4 was the professional version of win 95/98.

In the year 2000 Microsoft released both Windows ME, and Windows 2000. ME for the home, 2000 was the NT release for the workplace.

The products were merged with windows XP, now all windows is windows NT.

The version numbering makes sense if you count by the NT version numbers. 2000/ME is version 5, therefore XP is 6, and if you pretend Vista never existed (as you should for your own sanity) you get to windows 7 and it all starts to make sense.

[-] ice2194@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

Because in the end a "version number" is just part of the name. You can call it anything you want.

[-] voidMainVoid@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

That still doesn't explain why you would choose the other two instead of just counting 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 like a sane person.

[-] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago
[-] voidMainVoid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Cocaine is a hell of a drug.

[-] amycatgirl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 year ago

Gnome 40/41/etc is still 3.40/3.41/etc if I remember correctly

[-] sohrabbehdani@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

no they just decided to make 4.0 into 40

[-] ebits21@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Everything should be date-based name releases.

If it’s released April, 2023 it should be 23.04 or similar.

Other schemes are arbitrary.

Change my mind.

[-] FaeDrifter@midwest.social 7 points 1 year ago

How would you differentiate between versions with major api breaks?

[-] bjornsno@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Shhh, they don't know what that means, let them live in bliss

[-] ebits21@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 year ago

Lol. Developers just need to know what date the api changed. Viola.

[-] bjornsno@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Gotta know, are you serious or joking here? Follow up question: are you a developer and have you ever worked on a medium+ sized project? The amount of dependencies you end up with is astounding, you can't just "know" when all those APIs changed, that would be a full time job just to stay on top of. And that's not even taking into consideration transitive dependencies. If a library doesn't use semantic versioning, 99% of the time it's correct to avoid it just to save yourself the headache.

[-] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 7 points 1 year ago

Semantic versioning. If I have 1.0.0 and you release 1.1.0 I can be pretty confident it's safe to update. If you release 2.0.0 I need to read the release notes and see what broke.

If I have version July2023 and you release August2023 I have no information about if it's safe to update. That's terrible. That's really bad.

This is for dependency management and maybe apis more than OSs, but in general semantic versioning is a very good system. It should be used often.

this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2023
56 points (100.0% liked)

linuxmemes

21009 readers
410 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS