1
submitted 1 year ago by otter@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Pxtl@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Shows why Canadian news companies should be getting into the Fediverse.

[-] totallynotarobot@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Genuine question, not trying to be a snob about it…

Who actually uses Facebook and Instagram and stuff for news? It’s such a foreign idea to me that I’m interested in how many people actually get their news from these sites (as opposed to coming across it and interacting with it just because it’s there).

Are there actually people who will consume less news because of this? Is it specific demographics?

[-] otter@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

At one point I was following a few local news accounts on instagram because I'd scroll past some content while I was already looking through the feed. It wasn't my only way of getting news, but just another form of it.

Facebook dropping news probably won't affect me much, but I can see Google being more impactful. I know some people use the news feed as their primary way of finding news, and I also click on news articles when they come up on the search. Depending on the extent of the removal, it might replace a lot of reputable news with content that isn't "news" but still fills that niche.

[-] totallynotarobot@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I guess that’s the alarming part - if people don’t change their habits and read ads as news.

Thanks for the explanation!

[-] gaydarless@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago

This is a good reminder of just how much CBC puts out there. I am a little surprised not to see a mention of using alternative search engines like DDG or Bing, as to my knowledge those aren't blocking Canadian news corps. (Please correct me if you know differently!) I guess if the goal is to raise awareness of the content you can get without an intermediary, it makes sense.

I'm very interested to see which parties cave first in this standoff. If nothing else, I'm impressed the Canadian government had the balls to mandate this of American companies.

The Canadian government seems to be following Australia's lead. Australia was able to make deals with Google and Meta, so Canada is probably looking for the same thing.

[-] terath@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago

Yes, key word here is "make deals," which is what Australia ended up doing. They didn't just dictate terms like Canada seems to want to. The entire point of these companies banning news is to remind our government that no, you can't just dictate your terms, you actually have to negotiate. Maybe they will, we'll have to wait and see.

[-] jerkface@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

The one thing that makes government different than any other organization is yes they CAN just dictate the terms. That's their whole deal.

this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

7156 readers
340 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Regions


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Universities


💵 Finance / Shopping


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social & Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS