3
top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] sin_free_for_00_days@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

In the past, when there was a much higher tax on high income earners, instead of paying more in taxes, they would spread the wealth a little more equitably. This was true in Hollywood, in corporations, hell, in working service industry jobs. There were still rich, but so were others. In the past 40 years, we have been experiencing the greatest wealth transfer (over $50 fucking trillion ) from the working class to the 1% ever. And it's poised to get worse. Anyone who doesn't support unions and a strongly progressive tax is either ignorant of the history of the US, or an asshole. There is no in between.

[-] jan75@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

What's up with the writing - seems kinda weird, are the tweets real? I don't have twitter so i (semmingly?) can't check myself.

I like John Cusack, he's a great actor and seems like a decent human being, so no big deal either way but just wondering what's up with that.

this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2023
3 points (100.0% liked)

Movies and TV Shows

1 readers
2 users here now

General discussion about movies and TV shows.


Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title's subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown as follows:

::: your spoiler warning
the crazy movie ending that no one saw coming!
:::

Your mods are here to help if you need any clarification!


Subcommunities: The Bear (FX) - [!thebear@lemmy.film](/c/thebear @lemmy.film)


Related communities: !entertainment@beehaw.org !moviesuggestions@lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS