9
submitted 1 year ago by guriinii@lemmy.world to c/collapse@lemmy.ml

From Prof. Eliot Jacobson:

Wow! Wow! Wow!

North Atlantic sea surface temperature anomalies are going vertical again. And yes, I needed to extend the y-axis.

Yesterday's temperature of 24.49°C (76.08°F) was 4.2σ above the 1991-2020 mean. The previous high for July 17 was 23.71°C (74.68°F) in 2020.

https://twitter.com/EliotJacobson/status/1681321023306874880

all 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] majcurve@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago
[-] AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yep, but for a shining moment in time, humanity created a lot of value for shareholders!

[-] SnowBunting@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Those are the only important people in the world.

[-] GCostanzaStepOnMe@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Honestly how long do we have until we experience massive fishing and crop failures everywhere?

[-] melisdrawing@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Enjoy your days before. The working turn of phrase has consistently been, "Faster than expected."

[-] 1chemistdown@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

We already are experiencing that. Crab fishing season was cancelled in 2022 due to a sudden “where are our missing billions of crab?” Other fishing areas are likewise being affected.

Massive crop failures in China, Russia, Middle East, Africa, south and Central America have been going on for several years. Potable water is disappearing in many regions, forcing massive water migration.

[-] Ertebolle@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

On a planetary scale, I don't think we're going to have trouble feeding ourselves, it's just that a) meat is going to become thoroughly unaffordable and b) an awful lot of crop production is going to shift towards the poles, creating many a geopolitical clusterfuck along the way.

Disaster movies are too obvious, and too tidy; it's going to be a century of the average human's life getting just a bit more hellish every year. Acutely hellish for some, barely hellish at all for others, but basically, we're going to slowly roll back most of the improvements in human welfare over the past few centuries until we've got starving serfs all over the place and plagues and famines and natural disasters absolutely flattening entire countries for years at a time.

[-] MedicPigBabySaver@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Very fucking soon.

You ever watch disaster movies? They're only 2-2.5hrs average.

Well, imagine this is a movie. The 100+ years of data we ignored was that "secret file" that was just discovered. The new high temps are the geeky science guy yelling "oh shit!"

Remember what happens right after that? Very, very quick collapse. Food disaster, heat disaster, weather events and oxygen decrease in our atmosphere.

We'll either starve, boil, suffocate or kill each other trying to survive.

I think it's within a couple years. Not decades that is typically reported.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Couple years. We won’t get off that easy. This is sloooowww slide 🛝 with road rash and rug burns. It’ll be bad, then get better, then get worse, then get better, and then…

In no way, shape, or form is this good!

[-] Squirrel@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 year ago

Oh good, I was due for my daily dose of terror.

[-] BurnTheRight@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Thank a conservative. There will be no solution to climate change while conservatives have any power at all. The time for aggressive action to end conservatism is now.

[-] wnose@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

Why aren't you making your point in plain English instead of this roundabout way?

If you're implying that we should look at China's emissions – China's cumulative and per capita emissions are lower than the US. China is basically on par with the EU in terms of per capita emissions, so if anyone has some catching up to do it's the US with 2x (twice!) as much emissions per capita.

If that's not your point, then that's my bad – I see way too many people try to shift blame onto China in these conversations.

[-] xapr@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago

Also consider that the majority of the world has offloaded the majority of their manufacturing to China in that same timeframe, so it's not even a fair comparison to start with.

[-] xuxebiko@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

this is a nightmare

This looks like that “tipping point” that climatologists have been warning about

[-] marcos@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

No, the GP is talking about proportional effects. A tipping point is some completely different thing.

[-] hglman@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

This could easily be the effect of crossing a tipping point.

[-] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It takes about ~30 years to see the effects of emissions on the climate. That means the climate crisis we're experiencing right now is only the emissions up to ~1993. Looking at CO~2~ emissions alone, in 1993 the global total was 22.8 billion tonnes. The latest Data available is from 2021, which shows the global CO~2~ emissions at 37.1 billion tonnes. That's in increase of 14.3 billion tonnes of annual CO~2~ emissions in the amount of time it takes us to feel the effects, that's a 61% increase in Annual emissions, Not Total emissions. If we stopped all CO~2~ emissions today, it would continue to get considerably worse for at least the next quarter-century. We are truly ~~Fucked~~ on the bleeding edge of that climate "tipping point" and major changes are about to start happening very rapidly.

source for CO~2~ emissions numbers: https://ourworldindata.org/co2-emissions

[-] Gloomy@mander.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

It takes about ~30 years to see the effects of emissions on the climate

This is a long debunked myth.

Here is an article that goes into some detail.

https://www.carbonbrief.org/explainer-will-global-warming-stop-as-soon-as-net-zero-emissions-are-reached/

So there is some hope, if we can stop emoting CO2 ASAP. If one finds that a realistic path to belive in on the other hand is a matter of opinion.

[-] jackpot@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

what about carbon capture?

[-] BastingChemina@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago

Imagine a bull in a china shop destroying everything, now there is two options :

  • 1- you take the bull out of the shop
  • 2- you decide that it would be to inconvenient to take the bull out but you are sure that in a few decades we will invent a technology that can repair the China faster than the bull is destroying it.

Carbon capture is the option 2, we continue to break the carbon molecules for energy pretending that we can recapture later. It's not gonna happen, we need to stop emitting NOW and maybe we can think about carbon capture.

[-] xapr@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 1 year ago

Apparently the scale that's required makes it completely impractical, especially given the timelines that are also required.

[-] Boermund@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

Is this going to effect hurricane season in the way I think it will?

[-] guriinii@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Hurricanes are quite fickle, they need specific conditions, and due to El Niño they are less likely to occur.

[-] Boermund@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

Cool thanks for the answer

[-] CookieJarObserver@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Please keep Elninio in mind.

Climate change certainly plays a big part, but currently Elninio is likely the most impacting thing

I can't awnser @Skyler

Yes, Climate change, as said, plays a very significant role, but Elninio currently makes it a lot worse, the last Elninios where very weak, this one now relatively strong

[-] Skyler@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

There were multiple El Nino events during the period of 1982-2022 and yet none of them come close to 2023.

[-] guriinii@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

This is also related to the change in fuels for ships. They banned something that emits aerosols which has reduced the masking effect. And this started prior to El Niño starting. It's likely a combination of the above and some other tipping point shenanigans

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 year ago
[-] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Capitalism is working! Line go up!

[-] name_NULL111653@pawb.social -1 points 1 year ago

This isn't the free market we imagined... it's unregulated capitalism, to the point that smaller eco-friendly companies can't compete. At this point the market isn't free anymore.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It never was. Remember, capitalism has to be regulated to work. Adam Smith even said so. Looking at you ancaps and libertarians.

According to Adam Smith, markets and trade are, in principle, good things—provided there is competition and a regulatory framework that prevents ruthless selfishness, greed and rapacity from leading to socially harmful outcomes.

[-] Sabata11792@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

It works as intended for the guys who own the politicians so its not getting fixed.

[-] Cruxifux@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

George Washington was one of the richest men in the world. What do you think he was imagining exactly?

[-] Bipta@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

What sort of stupid comment is this blaming George fucking Washington?

[-] Cruxifux@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

He was the first US president and paved the way for the writing of the constitution, which is the basis of how the wests entire capitalist structure (and due to US controlled international hegemony, the world). Does that clear it up a bit for you where my point is? I can explain it further if you want. It’s not the only factor, but when people say “this isn’t the free market capitalism that was intended!” I tend to roll my eyes.

[-] kwking13@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I tend to roll my eyes when people think any one man is responsible for setting up the entire Western capitalist structure. I don't actually think that's what you're saying, but it's important to note that George Washington may have been the final decider, but had otherwise little to do with forming and reforming the policies that make up the capitalist structure as we know it today. It's extremely lazy to try and blame it on any one person.

[-] Cruxifux@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah that’s not what I was trying to do dude lol

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml -4 points 1 year ago

The intent is to blame the Founders, and they all were rich slave owners and businessmen. The entire American revolution was reactionary. This is what they wanted.

[-] red_october@reddthat.com 0 points 1 year ago

We need to stop this rhetoric. This is what "free market capitalism" always devolves into. It is not Marxists who are utopians, it is capitalists who believe that this is not the natural end result of the accumulation of power and rise of corruption that is inherent to capitalism.

this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2023
9 points (100.0% liked)

Collapse

3237 readers
2 users here now

We have moved to https://lemm.ee/c/collapse -- please adjust your subscriptions

This is the place for discussing the potential collapse of modern civilization and the environment.


Collapse, in this context, refers to the significant loss of an established level or complexity towards a much simpler state. It can occur differently within many areas, orderly or chaotically, and be willing or unwilling. It does not necessarily imply human extinction or a singular, global event. Although, the longer the duration, the more it resembles a ‘decline’ instead of collapse.


RULES

1 - Remember the human

2 - Link posts should come from a reputable source

3 - All opinions are allowed but discussion must be in good faith.

4 - No low effort posts.


Related lemmys:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS