14
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

The country claiming to have the most “freedom” of any country has the highest incarceration rate of any country.

[-] Asafum@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Not so fun fact: the constitution allows for slavery as long as it's a punishment for a crime.

Hmmm... Nah, those dots don't connect at all.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] darcy@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 year ago

you are loved and deserve happiness

Fuck Lemmy is unexpectedly wholesome

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Huffkin@feddit.uk 10 points 1 year ago

Oxford University is older than the Aztec empire.

Oxford University founded in 1326, Aztec empire ~1428-1521

[-] tristophe@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Don’t mean to pick, but Oxford was founded in 1096 and Cambridge in 1209.

I worked for cambridge in 2009 and got a nice little 800 year badge

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] baconeater@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago

Lighters were invented before matches! 1823 vs 1826

[-] SakaiSama@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

So why did anyone use matches then? Was it just more economically viable?

[-] niucllos@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

If you've ever played around with an old-style lighter (think classic Zippo) you'd get it! They're fairly expensive, and aren't airtight so they need to be refilled every few days/weeks. If you fill them too much they need to be kept upright or they'll spill lighter fluid on you. Super cool and can hold flames for a while but not nearly as conventient as a matchbook for quick fire lighting

[-] EmoDuck@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

It just occurred to me that zippos are basically the same type of oil lanterns that we've been using for thousands of years

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ch00f@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

The closest planet to Earth is Mercury.

On average that is. Mercury is actually the closest planet to every other planet in average. Because when it’s on the other side of the Sun, it’s still pretty close.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] zkikiz@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

General Motors, Firestone Tire, Standard Oil, and Phillips Petroleum were convicted of an actual conspiracy related to the monopolization of transit systems, which replaced beloved streetcar (rail) systems with rubber-tired oil-burning buses.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Motors_streetcar_conspiracy

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] swnt@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Oh, I have two good ones:

  1. Nuclear power causes less deaths (per energy unit produced) than wind (source)

  2. You get less radiation when living near a nuclear power plant, than if that nuclear plant hadn't been there.

To explain the second: A major misconception is, that nuclear power plants are dangerous due to their radiation. No they aren't. The effect of radiation from the rocks in the ground and the surroundings is on average 50x more than what you get from the nuclear power plant and it's fuel cells. (source). Our body is very well capable of dealing with the constant background radiation all the time (e.g. DNA repairs). Near a power plant, the massive amounts of isolation and concrete will inhibit any background radiation coming from rocks from that direction to you. This means, that you'll actually get slightly less radiation, because the nuclear plant is there.

Regarding the dangers of nuclear disasters. To this day, it's been very hard to find out, if at all any people have even died to Fukushima radiation (ans not other sources such as tsunami/earthquake/etc.) Nuclear radiation causes much more problems by being an emotionally triggering viral meme spreading between people and hindering it's productive use and by distracting from the ironic fact, that the coal burned in coal power plants spew much more radiation into the atmosphere than nuclear power plants themselves. (source)

[-] massacre@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

To this day, it’s been very hard to find out, if at all any people have even died to Fukushima radiation (ans not other sources such as tsunami/earthquake/etc.)

Truly no offense, but this is sort of burying the lede on Nuclear Power risks. Mathmatically coal releases more radiation - no question. It's also hard to pin down how many died due to Fukushima for ver good reasons: Correlation might be easy, but determining cause is ultra tough and no right-minded scientist would say it without overwhelming evidence (like they had something "hot" that fell on their roof and didn't know it for a long time). Also? They aren't dead yet. So we look to statistical life span models crossing multiple factors (proximity, time of exposure, contaminated environments and try to pin down cancer clusters attributable, and people can live for decades, etc....

The problem is that people rightly are concerned that in both Fukushima and Chernobyl (and 3 Mile for that matter) unforseen circumstances could have been catastrophically worse. You blow up a coal plant? You expose a region locally to it and it's probably "meh". You blow up a nuclear plant, and you get melt down corium hitting ground water or sea water with direct exposure to fissioning material and all the sudden you have entire nations at risk for subsequent spewing of hot material that will contaminate food supplies, water resevoirs, and linger on surfaces and be pulled into our lungs once it's in the dirt. Radioactive matieral is FAR more dangerous inside the body when you eat plants and animals that are exposed and pull it from the ground. Even cleaning down every surface, eventually you'll get some of it airborn to be breathed into our lungs again with wind storms, flooding and other natural erosion. The consequences are exponentially higher with Nuclear accidents and ignoring that is whitewashing. And that's not even getting into contamination from fuel enrichment, cooling ponds/pools leaking water, or the fact that it will take 30-40 years to clean up Fukushima (and they aren't sure how exactly that will happen and there could be another tsunami). Probably hundreds to try to clean up and contain Chernobyl - and given the current state of affairs we may find out even worse.

BTW, I'm pro-nuclear. Thorium salts seem a good way to go and we probably would already have these if not for the nuclear arms race making nations hungry for plutonium. Please don't short sell everyone's intelligence because you can claim "only" a handful of people died due to Fukushima. Direct death is only one facet. Lives were disrupted (and displaced) and for a while there, the impacts spread to the US across the Pacific and there were discussions of evacuating like 1/3 of Japan's population outside an exclusion zone. You can be pro nuclear while still acknowledging that some fears are real and well founded, and unfortunately the industry has proven gaps in safety that make it harder and harder to argue when we have Solar and Wind and rapidly ramping power storage. Nuclear is likely to simply be outcompeted over time (just like Coal and NG).

[-] rm_dash_r_star@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Nuclear power is actually the cleanest way to produce energy. The waste from replacing solar panels and windmills (which have a service life only three to five years) is actually more of a problem than the waste from spent fuel rods. Plus environmental impacts from fuel rod production are less than solar panel and windmill production. The problem with nuclear energy happens when things go wrong. It would have to be absolutely accident free. It never has been and never will be.

Though they're on the right track with nuclear power. Fusion would be ideal, runs on seawater (fuses deuterium/tritium) and if there's a problem you simply shut off the fuel. Problem is insurmountable engineering issues, we just don't have tech for it yet (need anti-gravity). They've been working on it for many decades and progress has been painfully slow.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] supersane@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

A broken clock is right twice a day, but a clock running backwards is right four times a day.

[-] TheButtonJustSpins@infosec.pub 6 points 1 year ago

A broken clock is right twice a day, but a running clock is probably never right.

[-] psud@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

My grandfather clock is correct* about once a week when I wind and correct it

*It must be correct as it's very slightly fast (less so than can be fixed with a quarter turn off the pendulum screw) and I set it slightly in the past

[-] lazyslacker@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

At this point you get into a philosophical discussion about what "right" really means

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Wanderer@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

The world is running out of sand.

It's one of the most used materials in the world for construction but islands are disappearing because of its limited supply.

[-] julianh@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Your car keys have better range if you press them to your head, since your skull will act as an antenna. It sounds like some made up pseudoscience that would never work in practice or have a negligible effect, but it actually works.

Edit: idk if it's actually because your skull acts as an antenna, although that's what I've heard. I looked it up and it seems like it's your head acting as a reasonance chamber. Since your body is conductive, your head can bounce and amplify the radio signal.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] LordOfLocksley@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

A day on Venus is longer than a year on Venus.

If you start to think about how these lengths of time are defined it becomes clearer.

1 day = time to rotate on it's axis once 1 year = time to complete a full rotation around the sun

For Earth, it takes us ~24hrs to rotate on our axis and 365.25 days to orbit the sun.

However, because Venus' axial rotation is so slow (and another interesting fact, it rotates in the opposite direction to other planets) it actually completes a full orbit of the sun before 1 axial rotation.

Hence, a year is shorter than a day

For those interested:

1 Venus day = 243 earth days 1 Venus year = 225 earth days

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] BalpeenHammer@lemmy.nz 4 points 1 year ago

Moose kill more people than bears every year.

Also Donald Trump was the president of the United States.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Flannels9658@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

All the planets in the solar system can fit in the space between the Earth and the Moon

[-] owenfromcanada@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

But putting them there is almost definitely a bad idea.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Clav64@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

An elephant is the only mammal with 4 forward facing knees.

[-] rikudou@lemmings.world 3 points 1 year ago
  • Wombat feces are cube shaped.
  • Bananas are berries and strawberries are not.
  • Oxford university is older than the Aztec empire.
  • Humans share 50% of our DNA with bananas.
[-] PlutoniumAcid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

The can opener was invented 30 years after the can.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] TauZero@mander.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

Almost every atom in your body has been part of other living organisms thousands if not millions of times before.

[-] Mugmoor@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Drinking Water has a 100% fatality rate. Everyone who drinks it eventually dies.

(also a good example of why correlation =/= causation)

[-] mycelium_underground@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

if you scramble a rubiks cube up there is a good chance that it is the first cube to be in that state. there are 43,252,003,247,489,856,000 possible states that a cube(3x3) can be scrambled up in to.

[-] xthexder@l.sw0.com 2 points 1 year ago

Not only that, but every single one of those configurations is solvable in 20 moves or less! https://www.cube20.org/

[-] Kodemystic@lemmy.kodemystic.dev 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Russia is actually pretty small and it almost fits inside Africa. Try it out: https://www.thetruesize.com/

EDIT: Ok I expressed myself in the wrong way. What I meant was, Russia is not as big as I thought it was. Of course, it's still really huge.

[-] datendefekt@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

I think that says more about how unbelievably massive Africa is.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] 1019throw@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

The northern most part of Brazil is closer to Canada than it is to the southern most part of Brazil.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] unhook2048@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

My last one was a bit confusing. Here's one

the word Helicopter is not as you'd think. Heli-copter.

The word is Helico, to mean spinning

and pter, as in feather, like pterodactyl

so the pronounciation is helico-ter.

P.S. I'm so sorry.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SpooneyOdin@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Cleopatra was born closer to the invention of cellphones than the building of the pyramids

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] birdcat@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

In future space travel spaghettification will be a serious concern.

[-] skillissuer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

black holes can have any density, even lower than water

[-] Tyler_Zoro@ttrpg.network 1 points 1 year ago

There are four stanzas to the Star Spangled Banner (the US national anthem) and what you typically here at sporting events is only the first.

Bonus fun fact, the fourth stanza contains the line that, in the 1860s became the shorter, "In God We Trust," motto on coinage that eventually became the national motto of the US in the 1950s (which was also when it was added to paper money). That original line from the fourth stanza was, "And this be our motto - 'In God is our trust.'"

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2023
14 points (100.0% liked)

Asklemmy

44183 readers
2189 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS