502

People donated more than $15,000 to the library system, which will be matched by the city, providing $30,000 for LGBTQ programming

top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Baylahoo@lemmy.world 68 points 1 year ago

I hate that it was needed, but it's beautiful to see a community come together to support something so important.

[-] kemsat@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

They returned the books. I guess they realized that it would constitute as theft, and decided not to get arrested over it. Or they have no backbone. Who knows.

[-] Rom@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

I think they just realized their stunt backfired and holding onto the books was no longer going to accomplish anything.

[-] TheBat@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I mean what were they going to do? Read?

[-] Rom@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Reading? And risk gaining empathy for other human beings? What do I look like, someone who's woke?

[-] Snowpix@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

Reading is for damn libruls!

[-] Gerudo@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Por que no los dos?

[-] Izzent@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I hate the fact that there's a stand for the books that is this prominent. If someone is closeted and wants to borrow one, there's no chance in hell to do it discreetly. It's like a big neon sign... Very inconsiderate if you ask me.

[-] xintrik@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago

I kind of assume a display like this is more for the curious than the closeted.

[-] Zahille7@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

And I'm sure they have a copy of each book on the display on their regular shelves, and it's more like "hey, here's some LGBT+ books we have, there's more on the shelves."

[-] Izzent@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Funny that a group that promotes inclusion would target a specific demographic at the cost of excluding all the others.

[-] Balios@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago

Assuming that only members of the community could possibly be interested in these books is one of the problems we have.

[-] Kara@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

If that was the only place you could get pride books? Sure

But I can only assume that there are other pride books around the library, and I think having a designated pride section is good for those who want it.

[-] stopthatgirl7@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And likely this was just for Pride month, and anyone wanting the books who is closeted can get them much more discretely later, or make a request with a librarian.

[-] bathorygod@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago
[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 year ago

This is the kind of story that simultaneously frustrates me and gives me hope.

[-] JustZ@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Anti pride protestors

So bigots.

...despite the vows set for in the threatening email, the checked-out books have been returned.

Hopefully those returned books are being examined for vandalism before going back onto the shelves. Wouldn't be too big of a stretch to imagine that people petty enough to try and keep the books out of circulation might find other ways to be assholes.

[-] mojo@lemm.ee -2 points 1 year ago

Sell the books for an infinite money glitch

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2023
502 points (95.6% liked)

News

23655 readers
4397 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS