I wrote this blog post. Talking about an innovative open source license. Give me comments about it! (mastodon.social)

submitted 1 year ago by FedCal@mastodon.social to c/opensource@lemmy.ml

3 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I wrote this blog post. Talking about an innovative open source license. Give me comments about it!

https://itsfoss.community/t/thinking-about-new-open-source-licenses/10965

@itsfoss @opensource @thelinuxEXP @nixCraft @gamingonlinux @omgubuntu @omglinux

top 3 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] RobotToaster@infosec.pub 8 points 1 year ago

It would violate point six of the open source definition[0], so wouldn't be an open source license.

[0] https://opensource.org/osd/

[-] ArcticAmphibian@lemmus.org 1 points 1 year ago

Very nice. The first sentence is a bit of a run-on. The three question marks is a bit too informal. The sentence "If, on the other hand, the redistributed software, want to be sold too, must be purchased as it is equivalent to a for-profit company" has grammatical errors. Keep writing!