231
submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

The criminal charges against former President Donald Trump related to efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election are some of the most serious allegations facing him, one law professor told NPR.

all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Arotrios@kbin.social 75 points 1 year ago

I'm loving this bit of info:

In this case, Trump is also facing a serious Washington, D.C., federal judge with years of experience, Tobias said. The case has been assigned to Judge Tanya S. Chutkan.

According to The Associated Press, Chutkan stood out for her tough punishment for Jan. 6 rioters. In at least seven cases examined by the AP, Chutkan imposed harsher penalties than what federal prosecutors sought for those rioters.

The AP wrote, "Chutkan, a former assistant public defender who was nominated to the bench by President Barack Obama, has consistently taken the hardest line against Jan. 6 defendants of any judge serving on Washington's federal trial court, which is handling the more than 800 cases brought so far in the largest prosecution in Justice Department history.

This is Trump's worst nightmare - on trial for the crime of the century before a judge appointed by his nemesis, who just happens to be a black woman from Jamaicia. I betting you could make a Jackson Pollock painting out of all the ketchup on the walls at Mar A Lago right now.

[-] DocMcStuffin@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

I love Wikipedia. Her article has already been updated.

She is the judge overseeing the criminal trial of former U.S. president Donald J. Trump over the events leading up to the January 6, 2021, United States Capitol attack.

[-] ForestOrca@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago

And there was much rejoicing!

He’s going to have to grift his followers by selling that painting.

[-] moistclump@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I saw someone refer to her appointment on the case as random. How random is the appointment of a judge and who decides or oversees or matches em up?

[-] MostlyBirds@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I don't know if it varies by district, but yes, federal cases are randomly assigned a judge from that district.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.one 0 points 1 year ago

The other 800 cases means we might not get a trial as fast as we'd like. :(

[-] roguetrick@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Defense will be the ones dragging their feet, not prosecution or the judge. Lots of witnesses they need to interview that prosecution already did. I wouldn't expect a quick resolution.

[-] bibliotectress@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I'm worried he'll be voted president again because people are clearly insane, be found guilty, and then use the "sitting presidents can't be guilty" memo defense he used last time.

[-] MicroWave@lemmy.world 67 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

For some relevant info from the article, here's a summary of the charges Trump is facing in Washington, D.C., for attempts to overturn the results of the 2020 election:

  • one count of conspiracy to defraud the United States applies to Trump's repeated and widespread efforts to spread false claims about the November 2020 election while knowing they were not true and for allegedly attempting to illegally discount legitimate votes all with the goal of overturning the 2020 election, prosecutors claim in the indictment.

  • one count of conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding was brought due to the alleged organized planning by Trump and his allies to disrupt the electoral vote's certification in January 2021.

  • one count of obstruction of and attempt to obstruct an official proceeding is tied to Trump and his co-defendants' alleged efforts after the November 2020 election until Jan. 7, 2021, to block the official certification proceeding in Congress.

  • one count of conspiracy against rights refers to Trump and his co-conspirators alleged attempts to "oppress, threaten and intimidate" people in their right to vote in an election.

The charge of "conspiracy against rights" goes back to the Civil War era.

It was passed after the Civil War as a way to stop members of the Ku Klux Klan and other similar organizations from intimidating, harassing and outright terrorizing Black voters especially in the South.

[-] Arghblarg@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 year ago

Page 30

The Deputy White House Counsel reiterated to Co-Conspirator 4 that there had not been outcome-determinative fraud in the election and that if the Defendant remained in office nonetheless, there would be "riots in every major city in the United States." Co-Conspirator 4 responded, "Well, [Deputy White House Counsel], that's why there's an Insurrection Act."

.. they were planning to use the Insurrection Act to stomp any resistance to Trump staying in office. Full-on dictatorship-style military coup and mass arrests, or worse. (Not news, but still stunning to see it in writing in an indictment.)

[-] MicroWave@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

What a bunch of lunatics. I wonder who Co-Conspirator 4 was.

[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Eastman or Clark I think.

Edit: it's Clark. If you read the indictment conspirator #4 is "a justice dept offical"

[-] Tots@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

I love a good indictment day. Lock him up!

[-] Chetzemoka@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

Happy Trump Indictment Day, everyone!!

[-] PuppygirlFranzia@pawb.social 8 points 1 year ago

Justice for all.

[-] FreddyNO@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Let him rot

this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2023
231 points (97.9% liked)

News

23664 readers
4797 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS