I like how "A lump in your neck" isn't preceded by "have a" like the rest of them. It's just a lump in your neck.
You may be at risk of throat cancer if you a lump on your neck.
I like how "A lump in your neck" isn't preceded by "have a" like the rest of them. It's just a lump in your neck.
You may be at risk of throat cancer if you a lump on your neck.
I like ignoring the bullets and just reading the rest of the text. "You may be at risk for throat cancer if you get checked now."
Can't get diagnosed with cancer if you never get checked!
It's like when I hear "Back in the days there was no cancer and no mental disorders". Like yeah, people just died randomly and behaved weird and were called possessed and stuff
oh no! i a lump in my neck.
My friend got rid of his throat, it did not seem like very much fun TBH.
Covering edge cases in leetcode be like
Not sure if the person who made this poster was being pedantic, or if it was intended to make people think, and realize that it could happen to anyone.
Could also be an error
Or, to quote the late, great Terry Pratchett: wizard did it.
Life: it has a 100% mortality rate
Technically correct - the best kind of correct!
You also can't scream, even when you must.
To paraphrase the Alien tagline: at the oncologist's office, no one wants to hear you scream.
(As opposed to most places, where people love it)
Have trouble swallowing food and lump in neck might be the same issue
You may be at risk for throat cancer if you: A lump in your neck.
They probably forgot to add the word ‘sore’ to throat. Happens to me quite often ;)
Technically correct.
I'm a guy like me!
Thankfully I have neither!
I have a mouth and I must screen.
What a terrible day to have a throat.
Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/NJOx7HuVqB0?t=26
https://piped.video/NJOx7HuVqB0?t=26
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.
4 points just don't look enough. What else could we write?
Trichoplax be like 🤷
Well, that’s one way to disprove the “brain in a vat” hypothesis, I suppose…