[-] 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de 23 points 3 days ago

Dominance over the food chain; dominance over the environment; dominance over where other species (and their own) are even allowed to live; dominance over the genetics of other species, etc.

[-] 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 5 days ago

I was 99% sure Finland for the first one though, but somewhat makes sense

[-] 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de 36 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Are they identical objects?

Ship of theseus

[-] 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de 43 points 2 months ago

Why do supermarkets stupidly pay rent in Manhattan, London, LA or Singapore when they could pay next to nothing to have a store in the Outback or Siberia?

[-] 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de 38 points 6 months ago

If there's a gold rush, you want to run the railroads, build the houses, sell the shovels and open the general store I guess

[-] 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de 41 points 9 months ago

One reason is that Epic are very dismissive of Linux, while Steam go out of their way to be supportive and GOG are supportive when it's convenient

Another is trying to lock games into exclusives with them, which other distribution platforms don't do so much

That said, if you don't play games without cross platform multiplayer and don't care about Linux support or see yourself caring any time soon, there's not a huge reason to push you towards steam and away from epic. GOG is more of an anti-DRM thing, however barring sales the price and the cut for the devs is identical on all of them and it's the same game aside from DRM.

[-] 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de 37 points 10 months ago

Exactly... The issue isn't spotify taking a very normal cut, it's the record labels taking a majority cut and it seems this bill misses that entirely

[-] 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de 39 points 1 year ago

A real gentleman would probably say "conjecture" or "unfounded information", but a less explicit word is "nonsense"

[-] 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de 42 points 1 year ago

Pay a bunch of tax on it then wonder what to do with my extra 580€ a month

[-] 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de 92 points 1 year ago

As much as Meta shouldn't be relied on for news, Canada creating legislation which stops Meta showing news then crying when Meta doesn't show news is frankly laughable and I don't know how their government didn't see it coming

[-] 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de 49 points 1 year ago

Have you ever used either?

To say they're reversed is pushing it as I'm not sure gnome is at the level of the low poly lara yet

13
That's not my name (discuss.tchncs.de)
-3
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de to c/fediverse@lemmy.world

Meta exist to make a profit, however they're never going to be able to advertise to most people in the fediverse, who also happen to be some of the most knowledgeable people in some fields. If they accept that they're never going to be able to advertise to those people, they go for the next best thing: monetising their content. Some here may rightfully have an issue with a corporation monetising their content, however by federating with the fediverse and being the first company able to monetise the content within it, Meta have a vested interest in not extinguishing the fediverse.

Complain about their privacy violations or them monetising content they don't generate as much as you want, but remember they're smart & money hungry, and the smartest thing they can do in their position is to make money out of people they otherwise wouldn't be able to.

view more: next ›

1rre

joined 1 year ago