[-] 1stTime4MeInMCU@mander.xyz 27 points 1 month ago

Guess it will remain Ms. Tery

[-] 1stTime4MeInMCU@mander.xyz 26 points 2 months ago

Honestly this is pretty much it. Sometimes you have to be pretty aggressive to get companies to do the thing you need; they will take advantage of the social friction required to keep you in predatory arrangements. They literally design it to be frustrating so you’ll give up. Like you, I try to make it clear to the person I’m speaking with I have no problem with them just the business. But if the corporations require me to get mad to do the right thing I will get mad.

[-] 1stTime4MeInMCU@mander.xyz 25 points 2 months ago

Extremely rare side effects aside, what about all the kids whose lives you destroy by _not _ intervening? Do you know how many confused cis kids go on blockers, decide they want to stop and go on and live a cis life? It literally almost never happens.

Of the children accessing trans healthcare available to minors, the overwhelming majority are trans kids who do not detransition or regret anything they do to transition. The kid you are “protecting” is that “confused cis kid” who is vastly outnumbered by genuinely trans children who will become transgender adults. By withholding blockers (at the minimum), you are sacrificing the well being of the overwhelming users of blockers, genuinely trans children, for the sake of the wellbeing of an almost non existent subgroup of confused cis kids.

How many trans kids lives are worth sacrificing so that one cis kid might not accidentally do something totally reversible that might increase their risk of cancer the same amount as eating bacon?

When you put it all together like that and the outcome is still a desire to prevent access, one has to ask: maybe the point is to make the trans kids suffer? Maybe the point is to make it harder for them to blend in with cis people? Maybe the point is to not treat their illness in hopes they give up and conform or kill themselves?

[-] 1stTime4MeInMCU@mander.xyz 29 points 3 months ago

Likely Accounting trickery

[-] 1stTime4MeInMCU@mander.xyz 23 points 8 months ago

It’s also only the largest plurality because it’s the default bucket. When you lump religious vs non religious the picture is very different

[-] 1stTime4MeInMCU@mander.xyz 26 points 8 months ago

That’s a great distinction, I’m gonna start stealing that.

Some people aren’t anti establishment, they are anti-not-my-establishment. You can’t call yourself anti establishment if you just don’t like the current one.

[-] 1stTime4MeInMCU@mander.xyz 26 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Not that I support it but does anyone know why Putin doesn’t just have this guy killed? Putin has lots of people killed and I feel like I’ve been hearing about this guys imprisonment for years. It’s surprising he’s kept alive in prison indefinitely rather than added to the pile. Is the fear it would trigger a bigger movement / martyr him?

[-] 1stTime4MeInMCU@mander.xyz 26 points 9 months ago

I mean, Christmas is borderline secular at this point. I’m an atheist but I’m not that triggered by it.

[-] 1stTime4MeInMCU@mander.xyz 25 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Florida, Texas, Montana, Tennessee, South Dakota , Idaho all banned it. Sounds like republicans

[-] 1stTime4MeInMCU@mander.xyz 27 points 1 year ago

demands neutral classroom

abolishes gender entirely

accidentally based

[-] 1stTime4MeInMCU@mander.xyz 29 points 1 year ago

Reduce, refurb, recycle!

[-] 1stTime4MeInMCU@mander.xyz 26 points 1 year ago

That’s awful. I don’t know why sign language isn’t made into an official state language that everyone has to learn some basic amount of proficiency

view more: ‹ prev next ›

1stTime4MeInMCU

joined 1 year ago