As someone who just uses an app to browse and thus has no stake in things, how much would doing this put onto the admins?
Lmao you must be really pissy, considering that you waited out your ban just to double down on it
Yes. That was the entire point. What have you been talking about this whole time
You seriously see no problem with just putting massive bundles of issues on a purely binary yes/no vote with no room for anything to be changed or removed?
Try to be a bit less disingenuous if you'd like to come back
but the Judge here is making things much more complicated than they ought to be.
How so? Is it not reasonable to enforce that ballot measures must be specific and not just a ton of stuff all bundled into a big all-or-nothing vote?
feel free to display your alleged superiority to someone who cares
You've repeatedly demonstrated neither interest nor ability to contribute in good faith.
personally, i lean in the same direction toyota does: electric vehicles are going to be part of the future, but likely not to the extent gas cars are the present due to the significant resource and infrastructure needs that battery electric cars carry.
Tbh without some major technological breakthroughs, battery EVs don't really seem like the way forward. They definitely have their place, but they're looking to be a shitty basket to place all our eggs in.
I hope that we can at least be able to discuss topics like gender, though only the admins know exactly where their own line in the sand is for respectful disagreement vs bigotry. @imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works summoning an admin for a second opinion and some clarification here.
depend on how that pans out, i may go the route many communities back on reddit did with just a blanket ban on the topic if the admins aren't in favor of a lot of leeway, since there's little value in discussion that can't be had without people catching bans. i hope that since the admins here are down to earth and not just on whatever powertrip the reddit ones are, we don't need to resort to more censorship than needed, but I've run communities under that standard before, so it wouldn't be a first on my end.
Misinformation is not appreciated here or considered to be good faith discussion