It sounds like you don't understand how jury selection works.
That's an idiotic way to interpret that. You end up with an answer so broad as to include almost any job in existence. Reigning it into a realistic earning amount for the position is the only rational way to approach that.
Think next time
Most AI are not built to answer questions. They're designed to act as some kind of detection/filter heuristic to identify specific things about an input that leads to a desired output.
It wouldn't be. It would still work. It just wouldn't be exclusively available to the group that created it-any competitive advantage is lost.
But all of this ignores the real issue - you're not really punishing the use of unauthorized data. Those who owned that data are still harmed by this.
Making it open source doesn't change how it works. It doesn't need the data after it's been trained. Most of these AIs are just figuring out patterns to look for in the new data it comes across.
The US justice system has gone out of its way to make itself not trustworthy. It's surprising it's that high.
What deadlines? Squadron 42 was supposed to release in 2016...
That ship has sailed.
What dumbass is letting AI post articles without human oversight? That's like rule one of what not to do.
He has no official power, but a lot of current Republican congressmen are spineless little shits who will do anything he tells them to do. And apparently Elon wants the government shut down so bullied trump into pushing for it
Should we tell him, guys?...
Did we already forget that BG3 existed like once year later...?
Bronzebeard
joined 3 weeks ago
None of these systems interact in an easy enough way to rig this without involving soo many people. Which means it won't be secret enough to get away with.