I could see Trudeau use disallowance if this law is passed and was used to remove a democratically elected member. It could be the constitutional case that ends total provincial control over cities.
0.1% people using million dollar trust funds to get their names on buildings suddenly find out they need to pay more on profits above 250 000.
With the CCP fucking with Canada multiple times ( viral research stolen, reneging on Canada China collaboration on COVID vaccine research etc.) It's no wonder Canada put in new rules on researching with China. I bet there was a lot more that the press didn't have access to.
It's their test case for abortion. You know their base would do anything to get it in. With the notwithstanding clause they could get it even if the supreme court rules it unconstitutional.
House Republicans will find that this will not be another Clinton impeachment. They will find a very hostile opponent and will end Congress with nothing to show the voters in 2024.
What did they expect when it was built as a hammer to end constitutional oversight? There is no onus to make a law constitutional with this clause.
NK gonna send their troops to Ukraine.
Lost causes are relegated to the history books, and remembered by ivory tower academics.
The most profitable companies also do the utmost to treat employees as contractors and avoid paying employer taxes, social security and health insurance.
Uber is just waiting for self driving cars and will fire all their contractors the day it happens. Amazon will fire all their delivery guys once drones work as intended.
What was that saying? Loose lips sink ships?
Threat from the modern left sounds like it came straight out of senator McCarthy.
Not just any municipality, the one with the most left leaning votes. Deliberate attempt to stymie any form of opposition. Trumpian politics at its worst.