[-] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 3 weeks ago

Except that's not really true. Or at least a half truth.

Steam prevents publishers from selling steam keys through other sites and means for less money. Publishers and other distributors are able to sell their games as cheap as they want anywhere they want. They just can't sell it dirt cheap somewhere and then use valves steam program and bandwidth to download and play the game.

[-] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 4 months ago

Even Castro had universal Healthcare.

[-] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 4 months ago

"Those materials have to be made available at the same prices the manufacturer charges to authorized repair providers."

One screen order $189. Three or more screens $120 a piece.

[-] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

The author has completely missed the MAIN reason the campaign was good in 2009 and isn't, now.

In 2009 the mindset was still that you needed a good single player game to get sales of a game. By 2015 call of duty had it figured out that they could almost completely ignore shoestringing a half asked campaign together and still get massive sales because their players were buying it for the multi-player, and all the money to be made by their fan boys buying it was in the multi-player.

[-] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 5 months ago

The US hard up needs straight socialized Healthcare. Our model is complete shit.

Their story gets even more screwed up. The woman who had the kids' health insurance (through her work, cause murika) cut this drug and others like it the day after the woman's kids were born. Doctors ran tests on her twins and confirmed the issue 4 days later.

So if she'd have had her kids less than a week earlier, the insurance would have been forced to cover it. I practically find it hard to believe it was such a coincidence.

[-] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 8 months ago

Also, it's generally cheap and easy to install a PC IE board for the back of your pc, if you really need it, and you'll have another 6 or 7.

[-] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 8 months ago

I'm worried about both. Neither should be president. Trump never should have been. Having 70 and 80+ year old presidents that couldn't program a damned TV remote is just a showcase of how terrible our plutocracy has become.

[-] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 10 months ago

So 2 cartoons that are by the same people. So basically a single source.

Indian food is probably given less shit in the states than most other foods. Mainly just the smell it leaves permeating through everything.

British food is tasteless trash. Mexican food makes you shit your pants. Chinese food is eating cats and dogs. Thai will burn your butthole to death. German food is angry and has sauerkraut. Canada just has syrup on everything. Japan is fish they won't cook. Irish is all potatoes and sheep belly. Indian is stinky and smells forever.
Americans deep fry everything.

We're an equal opportunity country. We'll talk shit on everyone.

[-] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 11 months ago

I moved back to Firefox like 5 years ago. But saying the vast majority of tools don't seem to do the trick is a pretty true statement, since that's one browser with one app, and the browser only has a sub 10% market share.

[-] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 11 months ago

Not me. My best friend growing up.

Child's Play came out when we were around 5. My friends parents rented it and planned on watching it after putting him to bed even though he wanted to see the movie (and of course theu told him he was too little). They started watching it and his dad noticed my friend had snuck back down and was watching the TV from the stairs.

Well his parents decided to act like they didn't notice and left him there to watch the whole movie.

The next day while my friend was at school his parents went out, bought a my buddy doll, and left it sitting up on his bed waiting for him. He had nightmares a good while after that one. Lol

[-] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 11 months ago

Well only because I've said where I live and how much I earn, before.

[-] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 1 year ago

It wasn't an under appreciated gem ever.

The movie was huge when it came out. Huge on vhs, quoted in schools, and was seen by damn near everyone between the ages of 12 and 30 during the mid 90's.

You think anyone in the 90s wasn't going to see a movie with Sandra Bullock, Wesley Snipes, Sylvester Stallone, and Dennis Leary?

It brought in like $160,000,000 at the box office, which was pretty good back in 1993 money and for like 5 years you couldn't go a week without it showing on one cable channel or the other.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

ColeSloth

joined 1 year ago