I don't know, it depends on the type of content you are used to seeing and these things, in my language and my interests, Mastodon is enough for me with about 150-200 daily toots from the media and people I follow, not all of them interesting, mind you, but most

It's pretty good, but I think it should be explained a little more about the selection of instances. I understand that for basic users what you put may be worth it, but such a long text I don't think it is for basic users and for those who want to know a little more to explain that they must take into account moderation policies and federated/defederated instances I don't think it is going to lengthen it too much over what you have now

Yes, I understand you, in my country it has not yet taken hold in a drastic way, but you see how politicians with ideas, social democrats at most, are treated in the press like ultra-intractable radical leftists.

Thanks for the info, I wasn't paying attention, but because British politics doesn't affect me of course, I'm sorry for what it does.

What you say is better than what the Tories did, but with such a large majority they could seize the opportunity and renationalise some privatized services, improve and adequately finance those that the right was letting die, change the tax system so that the upper classes help to finance the state. You already know, things that should be normal on the left until the "third way"

Like op, I'm not British and I wonder if this would be possible or do we forget that something like this is going to happen, I don't know, if you're from there, tell us.

Yes, I suppose you are right, the most basic thing has not failed but certain fundamental and important institutions seem to be in it, in any case one can have a horrible and dystopian but functional totalitarian state, without being failed, I don't know if I explain my point correctly .

this is also for @9point6@lemmy.world, I don't know how to answer both of you at the same time, but what I say is valid for both of us.

I don't know, I don't deny what you say, but as I was answering to another, then the United States is not a democracy anymore, it is a plutocracy where a few elites can decide policies, but the population lacks the capacity to change the trends even if there is a broad consensus for it.

this is sad

But you have a parliament (congress and senate), right? Why isn't there a third party in these chambers?

Well, if that only applies at the presidential level, a party can be created that competes at the legislative and state level. When it is established with enough power at that level, running at the presidential level might not be such a risky game.

If France wants the European Union to be a military power, there are two things that only France has and will have to share, one is nuclear weapons (I am glad to see that this is beginning to be considered) the other is the permanent seat at the UN, it can still be a Frenchman who sits there, even name it France, but it must respond to the interests of the union and answer to the commission

Without these two things together, the EU will never be a superpower on a par with the USA or China.

All my support and help for whoever accepts the position, for my part I do not see myself prepared to moderate a community in English that is not my mother tongue and it is already quite difficult for me to participate.

Whaaat? Why did they do that? Was it someone with contacts or something? Are they stupid and don't know who they are pardoning?