[-] Jentu@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 weeks ago

Arguably more successful is Abraham Lincoln. Though, it might be more accurate to say that the newly formed Republican party didn't kill the Whig party; rather the Whig party killed itself due to not listening to their constituents (which seems pretty relevant to our current situation)

[-] Jentu@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 weeks ago

If the voters are too apathetic to what the DNC is offering, the thought of abandoning them for something that is much more popular isn't a contradictory prospect. Having an enthusiasm problem so big that trump was able to be elected twice kinda points to the fact that people want something else.

[-] Jentu@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

Just superglue a neodymium magnet to the bottom of your bike shoe and hover it over the sensor lines in front of the stop light.

[-] Jentu@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

people whose politics is premised on empathy

You must not have read this part. Republican politics don’t rely on empathy, but democratic policy supposedly does, thus less turnout for a less empathetic democratic candidate.

[-] Jentu@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 month ago

But you clearly used a slur that was removed

[-] Jentu@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago

Choosing current republicans and current democrats is choosing the weapon to be used against you and especially against minorities. Both parties choose to uphold a system that relies on "winners" and "losers" to exist, which makes both of them willing to use minorities as a cost of maintaining profits and systemic power. Why is it acceptable to think it is better to choose the less lethal weapon instead of doing literally anything else to try to prevent all this systemic violence?

[-] Jentu@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago

Assuming you're liberal, my god this sounds straight out of the republican "stupid things to say when someone doesn't fellate America" playbook.

[-] Jentu@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

So democrats should adopt even more conservative views to avoid attack ads? Maybe they should focus on what the democratic base wants rather than the opinions of people who would never vote democrat.

[-] Jentu@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 month ago

I hear that's what historians are saying

[-] Jentu@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 month ago

I don't think Cheney cost Harris any voters because the vast majority of people who didn't vote for Harris probably don't know and don't care who Cheney is. But celebrating the Cheney endorsement is a symptom of a campaign that is thoroughly unexciting and establishment. People who don't follow politics aren't word-of-mouth'd into being excited for something new and hopeful. Instead of democrats' excitement about the promises of a new candidate, the only word on their lips was Trump, which won't work a second time if the apolitical person's world didn't change negatively the last time trump was president.

[-] Jentu@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 month ago

Democrats don't have to say any slurs to uphold a racist/sexist system. Send out a memo condemning racism while increasing police funding and surveillance. Tokenize people in their cabinet with a smile and a hashtag while bombing, destabilizing, and plundering the global south. Our hierarchical and white supremacist systems are so embedded in our society, it's assumed to be the natural order of things.

[-] Jentu@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I’m still using a (Son) dynamo Busch and Müller light from a decade ago on my touring bike. It’s so reliable and the beam pattern is better than on my car. I also have schwalbe marathons and ortlieb panniers on that bike. Such a good setup for a bike built like a tank. It might be fully German if it wasn’t a Fuji with a Shimano groupset and Brooks saddle.

view more: next ›

Jentu

joined 2 months ago