[-] JokklMaster@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

Turned into? 10 years ago it was obvious if you had open ears.

[-] JokklMaster@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

Source? I have never seen a single car that does this.

[-] JokklMaster@lemmy.world 41 points 5 months ago

Look around lemmy. You have tons of people saying they don't like either candidate or their vote doesn't matter so they won't vote. Imagine how many people out there are willing to vote for a candidate from a dynasty.

[-] JokklMaster@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

Operative word being: knowingly.

9

Can anyone help me solve this? I have a Samsung Galaxy Watch (I believe it's the original, I got it in 2019) and ever since my phone (S23 Ultra) last updated it doesn't save my notification settings. I like to have it set so that my watch still notifies me while I am on my phone and that when my watch is connected to my phone it silences notifications on my phone. I can still set that, but when I turn it off at night it resets the settings so every morning I have to open the wearable app and redo my settings. Does anyone know how to fix this?

[-] JokklMaster@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

There's definitely already stuff like that for Dracula and Frankenstein's monster.

[-] JokklMaster@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago

99%, don't forget about colostomy bags my friend.

[-] JokklMaster@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago

MS18 actually. Genuinely the brightest handheld flashlight in the world.

[-] JokklMaster@lemmy.world 31 points 10 months ago

This is not the fundental attribution error. The fundamental attribution error is seeing an action from a person and assuming it is a fundamental attribute of them. Literally in the name. E.g. you seem someone being rude in public so you assume they are a rude person. Meanwhile if you are rude in public you chalk it up to being in a bad mood as a result of something that happened to you, not because you are a rude person.

[-] JokklMaster@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

It's literally an issue of them not understanding it. Most progressive policies when explained to them they agree with, they've just been taught to hate names. It's just so hard to teach people.

[-] JokklMaster@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

I think it's more often an involuntary manslaughter charge due to the gross negligence of allowing a child access to a gun. But sometimes it can be counted as murder even if it was unintentional if you were doing something so reckless and stupid you should have realized it would likely result in someone's death. There's an argument to be made that keeping a gun somewhere a child could access it would count.

[-] JokklMaster@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Well they literally say there's none left. Their comment wasn't condescending. You kind of just asked a dumb question.

view more: next ›

JokklMaster

joined 1 year ago