I'll add your snap if you can recite the full rules of Magic the Gathering

Yes, you are breaking a law. Copyright infringement in this manner is an offence under the Copyright Act 1957 punishable with up to three years imprisonment and a fine.

It indirectly comes from shareholders. Money gone to pay fines isn't distributed by dividends. Theoretically, this hurts shareholders by decreasing the value of a share, since the company is worth less money after paying the fine. However, assessing a fine that shareholders have to pay out of pocket would trample the concept of limited liability and cause financial panic. I remind you that it's not only rich people that are Amazon shareholders.

I understand the sentiment but this is a pretty uninformed take.

It's gone rancid

The base model of the iPhone still doesn't have USB 3 and won't have the latest USB-PD. The USB 2 standard was released over 20 years ago. The Lightning plug was released over 10 years ago. The plug technology on iPhones is seemingly being kept out of date on purpose. At least that is what people are complaining about.

2022: OnlyFans wanted to ban porn

2023: Unity wants to kill free-to-play games

Yep. Anyone can do that, actually. I can declare you a terrorist. It's totally my right to do so, but the question is–so what? What am I going to do about it?

The US government has declared the Iranian organisation a terrorist organisation. What have they done about it?

The amount of outrage on this thread is just ignorant people learning how international geopolitics and the concept of absolute state sovereignty work for the first time. Yes, it is the case that big countries get to stick their fingers into the business of little countries. Yes, it is unfair. But that's how it is and that's how it's always gonna be for the foreseeable future. That's how it always has been for all of human history. From Ur to Rome to Vienna to London to Washington. From Chang'an to Beijing to Nanjing to Tokyo and now back to Beijing. In the next century maybe it will be some other country kicking around everyone else instead of the US. But I can practically guarantee that there will be kicking and there will be people continuing to complain about how unfair it is, because it is and always has been.

I'd like to say we should do better as a species, but in reality, what we have now is really fucking amazing compared to when Genghis Khan would come romping around town destroying your villages and murdering your people, or the Romans coming and demanding fifty talents of silver by sunset or else, or the Belgians planting rubber trees in your backyard.

Imagine posting this drivel on the Internet and you're not even getting any money for making such a fool of yourself in public

I won't spoil the plot for you, but let's just say I really couldn't even if I tried.

There is written Cantonese that is slightly different from written Mandarin, but the vocabulary is similar enough that it is mutually intelligible. It's about as different as American English and Indian English.

Most of the time when writing Cantonese, you will write it in "formal" terms which are technically pronounced differently. So instead of a casual word, you will write the formal equivalent, but when reading it back you can transcribe it on the fly to the informal equivalent again. If you know Cantonese, you can watch TVB news reports with the subtitles on and you'll see this being done when they interview people.

For example, the word "without" in Cantonese is 冇 (mou), and in Mandarin it is 没. But a Cantonese speaker will still write "mou" as 没, or 無, even though those characters are supposed to be pronounced "mut" and "wu" in Cantonese and are considered formal. When reading it back, you can either say "mou" or "mut"/"wu" and both are considered fine, it just depends on how formal you want to be.

Another thing is that Mandarin is written exactly as it is said, and if you then read the writing back in Cantonese, it is completely intelligible, it just sounds overly formal and terse. So a Mandarin speaker can write something down and a Cantonese speaker will understand it. A Cantonese speaker can write something down using very formal terms and the Mandarin speaker will also be able to read it.

You can write Cantonese using the actual characters for the informal terms but then only Cantonese people will be able to read it since the characters used aren't commonly used in Mandarin. Even then many Cantonese speakers only know how to read/write the formal version and will have to guess at the "informal" version.

Another interesting thing is that there is actually a lot of shared vocabulary between Cantonese and Mandarin. In fact, most of the "formal" vocabulary is shared and exactly the same, since the both derive from Classical Chinese. Classical Chinese is really just "peak formality" of regular Chinese (all dialects). Thus if you write in Classical Chinese most educated Chinese speakers will be able to read it! This is why Chinese is described as "the oldest language in the world". An example is a no-smoking sign. In informal Cantonese, it's 唔好食烟, which is nonsense to a Mandarin speaker. It would literally mean "?? good eat smoke" in Mandarin (the first character is almost never seen in Mandarin). But you can write the formal term, which is 禁止吸烟, which is exactly the same and 100% readable in both Cantonese and Mandarin. It means "smoking is prohibited" in both languages.

"IPv6 is not a feature; its absence is a bug"

• Someone on the Flathub repo, I think