[-] RookieNerd@hachyderm.io 1 points 2 months ago

@rglullis @cabbage In a way, it's just like splitting utility bills with flatmates.

Many instances do the same. They require members to pay at least a (reasonable) minimum amount in a year. This is also well stated since day 0 in their registration form.

[-] RookieNerd@hachyderm.io 1 points 11 months ago

@talou @caos @deadsuperhero A nice and good read in this regard comes from the ActivityPub academy: https://seb.jambor.dev/posts/understanding-activitypub-part-2-lemmy/
This explains it very well

[-] RookieNerd@hachyderm.io 1 points 11 months ago

@root_beer @fediverse I understand the point, but what if there are different needs and use cases? Like a network of schools in a specific region that want to coordinate, interact and share events among them?

[-] RookieNerd@hachyderm.io 1 points 11 months ago

@poVoq @geoma This looks interesting. Would you imagine the marketplace as paired to the local listings?

Given that one big problem of the fediverse for business applications so far is discoverability, I imagine to have a federated service that indexes all posts from accounts on that instance, and also has a marketplace. It basically is a federated Etsy? 😳

[-] RookieNerd@hachyderm.io 1 points 11 months ago

@fresh @geoma It looks interesting. Business benefits over hosting WordPress and federating it with some plugin?

[-] RookieNerd@hachyderm.io 1 points 11 months ago

@CannotSleep420 @geoma What is the currently accepted/perceived use case for federation then?

I personally perceive that the Fediverse is currently appealing to geeks, organizations that look for digital sovereignty or autonomy, curious people looking for something new, die-hard alternatives

[-] RookieNerd@hachyderm.io 1 points 11 months ago

@SomeoneSomewhere @geoma Probably it just means that people are on massive platforms like Instagram only because everybody else is there (?)

[-] RookieNerd@hachyderm.io 1 points 11 months ago

@geoma @h3ndrik we get back to other issues/problems that are discussed somewhere here around on Lemmy. Striking the balance between autonomy and management costs is always hard. That's why probably there is the need to have a service that helps users get paired with the best software given their needs.

As others are saying, Firefish/Calckey might be interesting in that sense.

(gosh, even Friendica has a relevant concept there, but it is soooo unpolished and not appropriate for business.

[-] RookieNerd@hachyderm.io 1 points 11 months ago

@fediverse So, these problems break the whole idea of having one profile for accessing all the available content on the Fediverse. In general, this can be described as one major problem: even if my chosen instance is federated with some other where the content I am interested in is available, I will still have some issues in accessing.

[-] RookieNerd@hachyderm.io 1 points 11 months ago

@fediverse

  1. People are interested in communities and content. The idea of using one single client and being able to access all types of content from any kind of instance sounds great, but it's still a dream. Let's say that I am interested in memes and the communities I know of are most active on lemmy.world. Realistically, with my Mastodon account I am not going to have the same experience that I would have with using Lemmy just for that. I need to register a new account on lemmy.world.
[-] RookieNerd@hachyderm.io 1 points 11 months ago

@fediverse From my experience I am having two main issues when talking with people about the Fediverse:

[-] RookieNerd@hachyderm.io 1 points 11 months ago

@stu @yogthos Can anybody point to research or literature about the development and survival of FOSS communities? I am only aware of Gabriella Coleman's studies on Debian and Raymond's "The Cathedral and the Bazaar"

view more: ‹ prev next ›

RookieNerd

joined 1 year ago