There's "not caring about" them and there's "making it so people who could play before now can't". You're purposely shrinking your active user base while simultaneously shutting out a growing segment of the market. In the name of a feature that's arguably not even effective at its goal.

The salt is real. (And the edits.)

WTF? Seatbelt use is down?? I'd be really curious to see a Venn diagram plotting anti-maskers with the mind-numbingly stupid people who would voluntarily choose not to wear a seatbelt in the face of decades of science and societal pressure.

Seriously, hearing that seatbelt use it down to me is as shocking as when I was watching "Anchorman" and they were walking in the park and just dropped all their trash on the ground. Except that movie was parodying the way people used to think in the 70's. This is real life.

Windows was still DOS under the hood for a long time. Win 98 was Win 95. Win 8 was Win 7. This is nothing new for MS.

In case we needed yet another reason to avoid that company. I have no idea why they're so successful despite being absolutely despicable.

Linux noobie here. Any tips on what to search for for instructions on how to do this? Bonus points if it has a GUI and is easy to use.

I'm tentatively interested, but I can't remember the last open world game I played that wasn't just a reskin of something I've already played before. Sure, a game doesn't have to be innovative to be fun. But it sure helps. Especially in a genre that can feel like doing chores, rather than playing, if it's not done well.

Weird how reading the article will sometimes give more information than just reading the headline, isn't it?

It was absolutely the latter. And I absolutely would sue if I didn't have serious health issues (hello, cancer!) to deal with instead. It takes a lot of time and effort to deal with something like that, and that's just not in the cards right now.

What's that? I couldn't hear you over the sound of my wife's pussy drying up and she was just sitting next to me while I read that!

It's very frustrating to feel like I'm back to where were were before the streaming revolution: paying HUGE amounts of money to get TONS of content I'm mostly not interested in.

The only saving grace is that I can get it all without ads still, so I'll take that win.

In the article, they talk about the bundling of services as a bad thing, but I feel like if I'm going to pay for everything anyways, I'll happily take that huge discount, TYVM.

Uh, no? Netflix used to have everything good. You could drop your $150/mo cable sub and get $10/mo Netflix and never look back.