[-] TheBenCommandments@infosec.pub 20 points 1 year ago

We’re going to need a video of this now. Pay the cat tax.

[-] TheBenCommandments@infosec.pub 11 points 1 year ago

Thinking differently is for liberals. Conservatives think the same.

[-] TheBenCommandments@infosec.pub 15 points 1 year ago

In general, sure, books can be great. When it comes to nonfiction, they need to be based on repeatable science (AKA studies). I don’t think it’s a huge ask to bring some facts to a conversation about science.

[-] TheBenCommandments@infosec.pub 19 points 1 year ago

I don’t give a shit what the founder of Greenpeace or someone who has published books thinks. I care about scientific studies. I’ll be here to review them if/when you care to actually contribute to this conversation with verifiable facts, rather than just things you remember.

[-] TheBenCommandments@infosec.pub 16 points 1 year ago

Do you have a source for thinking that over the lifespan of the vehicle, that an EV is worse for the environment than a gasoline powered vehicle? Because I have multiple studies referenced in this article from the EPA stating the exact opposite.

The advantage of using an electric powertrain over any other is that the energy can be produced by any source of energy. Yes, right now, a lot of that’s coming from coal and natural gas, but even then, those power plants are WAY more efficient than the gas engines in cars and produce FAR less greenhouse gases source. Also, as countries transition from coal and gas to solar, wind, geothermal, and most critically and hopefully nuclear, the way the energy makes it from the earth to our cars can remain the same: the power grid.

Also, if everyone buys used cars, then that’ll solve the problem? Where do you think used cars come from? You think we should just keep making ICE vehicles and burning shit when we have plenty of new technologies which are being developed at breakneck pace that could actually make a huge difference in reducing emissions?

[-] TheBenCommandments@infosec.pub 13 points 1 year ago

I was just thinking that, like Jupiter’s red spot storm. Probably like 5 years tops.

[-] TheBenCommandments@infosec.pub 11 points 1 year ago

Which is zero children to indoctrinate by way of fear and hate.

[-] TheBenCommandments@infosec.pub 14 points 1 year ago

First they take the dinglebop, then smooth it out with a bunch of shleem. The shleem is then repurposed for later batches. They take the dinglebop and push it through the grumbo. Where the fleeb is then rubbed against it. Its important that the fleeb is rubbed, because the fleeb has all the fleeb juice. Then a shlammie shows up and he rubs it and spits on it. They cut the fleeb. There are several hizzards in the way. The blamfs run against the trumbles and the ploobis and grumbo are shaved away. That leaves you with a regular old plumbus.

[-] TheBenCommandments@infosec.pub 10 points 1 year ago

It doesn’t really matter what the content is. Allowing the government to dictate what content can or cannot be accessed is not a good idea.

[-] TheBenCommandments@infosec.pub 10 points 1 year ago

That’s because it’s objectively terrible coffee.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

TheBenCommandments

joined 1 year ago