[-] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 15 points 1 month ago

I like the cut of this guy's jib.

32
7
37
25
65
13
34
34
17
9
45
12
[-] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 14 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It should be a conspiracy of like-minded individuals that exists parasitically within Starfleet, not an official (or an unofficial official agency).

In fairness, Sloan said they were a branch of Starfleet Intelligence with an official designation in his very first appearance on DS9, and nothing that came after that really contradicted him (other than his obvious lies in "Inter Arma Enim Silent Leges").

Whatever liberties have been taken since then, that wasn't one of them.

[-] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 13 points 3 months ago

Not everything needs to be ranked.

[-] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 13 points 3 months ago

I'm not sure I'd leave Neelix in charge of the Female Changeling's prison cell...

[-] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 14 points 4 months ago

Yes, it's been absolute pandemonium in the streets since the CAF dress code was relaxed in 2022. Thank goodness they are addressing this very real issue that the average Canadian cares deeply about.

[-] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 13 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

The call was (supposedly) about an unattended two-year-old outside at 4 am. I don't think that's the questionable part of this story.

[-] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 15 points 6 months ago

Well if the Canadian Taxpayers Federation says it, it must be true.

[-] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 13 points 9 months ago

It's an RCAF Challenger jet.

[-] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 13 points 10 months ago

Hell, I support the carbon tax, but I couldn't tell you how much I've paid, how much I've received (well okay, I could look that up), or what the overall environmental impact has been.

[-] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 13 points 11 months ago

I think single-issue elections are a myth, but there's no doubt that that's top-of-mind for a lot of people right now.

um excuse me it's called "efficiency"

The answer (which I do not necessarily endorse) is that the Canadian government decided this particular division was not guilty, back in 1986:

The Galicia Division (14. Waffen grenadier division der SS [gal. #1]) should not be indicted as a group. The members of Galicia Division were individually screened for security purposes before admission to Canada. Charges of war crimes of Galicia Division have never been substantiated, either in 1950 when they were first preferred, or in 1984 when they were renewed, or before this Commission. Further, in the absence of evidence of participation or knowledge of specific war crimes, mere membership in the Galicia Division is insufficient to justify prosecution.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

ValueSubtracted

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF