[-] Zalack@startrek.website 2 points 1 year ago

That's a really interesting perspective I didn't think I've seen before. Thanks for posting.

[-] Zalack@startrek.website 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Imo that's still not enough. Plenty of crashes or failures happen in a way where loading screen animations still keep playing. Having a cursor you can move around to validate that the process is still responsive is important feedback.

I also remember lots of games that did exactly what you are saying and there was no way to tell if it had hung during loading or not because you couldn't check if it was accepting feedback.

[-] Zalack@startrek.website 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Formal licensing could be about things that are language agnostic. How to properly use tests to guard against regressions, how to handle error states safely.

How do you design programs for critical systems that CANNOT fail, like pace makers? How do you guard against crashes? What sort of redundancy do you need in your software?

How do you best design error messages to tell an operator how to fix the issue? Especially in critical systems like a plane, how do you guard against that operator doing the wrong thing? I'm thinking of the DreamLiner incidents where the pilots' natural inclination was to grab the yoke and pull up, which unknowingly fought the autopilot and caused the plane to stall. My understanding was that the error message that triggered during those crashes was also extremely opaque and added further confusion in a life-and-death situation.

When do you have an ethical responsibility not to ship code? Just for physical safety? What about Dark Patterns? How do you recognize them and do you have an ethical responsibility to refuse implementation? Should your accreditation as an engineer rely on that refusal, giving you systemic external support when you do so?

None of that is impacted by what tech stack you are using. They all come down to generic logical and ethical reasoning.

Lastly, under certain circumstances, Civil engineers can be held personally liable for negligence when their bridge fails and people die. If we are going to call ourselves "engineers", we should bear the same responsibility. Obviously not every software developer needs to have such high standards, but that's why software engineer should mean something.

[-] Zalack@startrek.website 1 points 1 year ago

I actually think the radio signal is an apt comparison. Let's say someone was trying to argue that the signal itself was a fundamental force.

Well then you could make the argument that if you pour a drink into it, the water shorts the electronics and the signal stops playing as the electromagnetic force stops working on the pieces of the radio. This would lead you to believe, through the same logic in my post, that the signal itself is not a fundamental force, but is somehow created through the electromagnetic force interacting with the components, which... It is! The observer might not understand how the signal worked, but they could rule it out as being its own discreet thing.

In the same way, we might not know exactly how our brain produces consciousness, but because the components we can see must be involved, it isn't a discreet phenomenon. Fundamental forces can't have parts or components, they must be completely discreet.

Your example is a really really good one.

[-] Zalack@startrek.website 1 points 1 year ago

In many cases it should be fine to point them all at the same server. You'll just need to make sure there aren't any collisions between schema/table names.

[-] Zalack@startrek.website 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What about spicy food? Go for the Trifecta!

[-] Zalack@startrek.website 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah. Part of me has to wonder what -- if any -- backchanneled agreements there are between Glynn Shotwell and the DoD for if/when Musk does something truly compromising.

[-] Zalack@startrek.website 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Its original mandate was investigating financial fraud. Presidential protection came later and has always been in addition to their original mandate.

[-] Zalack@startrek.website 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Of course. I'm just saying pray for the ad-free version then. If you are going to use it.

[-] Zalack@startrek.website 2 points 1 year ago

I'm not sure what your point is?

[-] Zalack@startrek.website 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's very subjective. I have yet to find a Linux desktop I like as much as MacOS, especially when it comes to WACOM drivers. The stylus response time/curve almost always feels wrong.

Also, I've worked with designers who can get something that looks and feels fully professional on a first pass, so it's not just newness for Lemmy.

[-] Zalack@startrek.website 1 points 1 year ago

Man I really wanted to like Jerboa but it just has such terrible UX. I ended up signing up for Kbin.social as I thought it had the best UI and now I'm back to Lemmy through Sync.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

Zalack

joined 1 year ago