[-] ZenFriedRice@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think the word anarchy is bad branding. (Though good branding is impossible when the king want his citizens to hate you.)

From what I understand, the main goal of anarchy is to remove the system that separates us from power. For example, representative democracy makes it so you just go "pretty please represent me" without having any direct agency over the world around you.

Anarchy is not "remove all the rules".

Edit: if there is a system that facilitates personal rights and agency then it is not necessarily against anarchy.

[-] ZenFriedRice@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's all word views. Obviously a Christain who believes in souls has no reason to respect an animal if it doesn't have one.

But, I just think we are matter, so I imagine that matter inherently experiences. In that case, humans are no longer the obvious protagonist who has no reason to feel bad about abusing the rest of those out there.

Edit: And the fact that racism likely comes from people looking different, acting different, having resources we want, difficulties in communication, and/or leaders having an incentive to support it, it is pretty easy to see how specism exists. Whethere or not you care about that is up to you.

[-] ZenFriedRice@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Good point, finding a security vulnerability is a success not a failure.

[-] ZenFriedRice@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

In college I was told over and over that SECURITY BY OBSCURITY IS NOT ACTUALLY SECURITY. So using thoroughly tested and examined security techniques from open source software is the gold standard.

There are known secure algorithms that cannot be cracked by modern computers. So, no reason to try and reinvent the wheel and just hope your way is better despite decades of refinement and research into modern open algorithms.

[-] ZenFriedRice@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Aye I was making my comment in part to humanize the people we call terrorists.

[-] ZenFriedRice@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

You have a point. Though the US white supremesists haven't launched such organized and open assaults. So maybe it just scales with human rights abuses.

[-] ZenFriedRice@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

I'm curious too

[-] ZenFriedRice@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Should pay be related to what percentage of your net worth you risk? $1000 is a very different amount of risk for different people.

[-] ZenFriedRice@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

I use organic maps on Android

[-] ZenFriedRice@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Businesses have damaged public health for profit so many times that I don't think there should be any trust any more. All business processes, research, algorithms, etc should be public. No new materials should be used widespread without 3rd party safety testing.

We can't keep adding layers of permanent poison to the planet.

[-] ZenFriedRice@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Aye the rich are likely very nutritious

[-] ZenFriedRice@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago

what in the world is an unamed class

view more: ‹ prev next ›

ZenFriedRice

joined 2 years ago