ahem, I believe it’s mustache-twirling...

saw this on mastodon just now…

This one is just you.

then I suppose “paranoid delusion” is more appropriate.

Do you remember when he left you? Did he ever lay his hands on you or your mother? Other siblings? Remember, it’s not your fault he hit you. You’re not a bad person.

I’m sorry to hear of your troubled childhood

No, I’m talking about the one angry troll pretending to be six different people who is being toxic in this thread.

right, because the only way some could disagree with or object to a brigade of angry trolls from hexbear is because of some “conspiracy” you can’t prove.

lol

You’re committing a strawman fallacy, or a false equivalence, or a false dichotomy, whatever, take your pick. You don’t know the difference, anyway.

“I know you are but what am I?” doesn’t make a convincing argument. most people learn that when they’re 5.

No one’s buying it, you know that, right?

Whhaaaa??? you mean to say that a brigading band of angry trolls from two of the most toxic instances in the fediverse remain unconvinced by facts and logic??? GASP!!

You said “[a yes vote on Russia annexing Crimea] never happened.”

YOU said that. keep your words out of my mouth.

I showed that it did.

you know everyone can see your comments and my comments, right? that is very much not what happened, as anyone with eyeballs can see. I’m sorry that you’re having trouble seeing reality. consult a physician.

You responded with “We’re taking about Hawaii here.”

because we are, despite your attempts to change the subject. are you lost again?

I see the comment I replied to, the context and words used, and how it was changed to suit an argument once the facts became inconvenient.

perhaps you should pay closer attention to the conversation before you jump in unprepared.

I see you have reading comprehension problems

more insults not based in fact. just because I don’t fall for your countless logical fallacies and outright lies - all of which I’ve posted out and explained in detail - doesn’t mean I have any problems reading or comprehending. you’re just mad I keep calling you out. hence the insults.

and if you can’t even win an augment against “children’s pictures”… well, that’s certainly a self-own, as far as I’m concerned.

Sounds like you’re talking about yourself there colonizer.

“I know you are but what am I?” is not a convincing argument. most people learn this when they’re 5.

I’m just making a basic observation

you’re hurling insults because you’re mad, and can’t make an argument based on the facts. but keep trying to convince me you’re “entertained” while throwing name-calling tantrums, lmao

YOUR ARGUMENT is that the result of this referendum matters

The FACTS bear that out. you’re attacking me because I pointed that out.

It doesn’t because, as you’ve identified, both options are the same

I didn’t say that, you did. keep your words out of my mouth.

As for Hawaiian resistance, they’ve been fighting continuously for a hundred years and, like every other liberation movement against the USA, have been ruthlessly suppressed by the fascist police and petty-bourgeoise militia of the “middle class”.

relevant to the argument, and a

you guys are addicted to logical fallacies

And, like every other liberation struggle, victory is inevitable as the empire continues to crumble beneath the weight of its sins.

cute story. also irrelevant

Also, neat how you’ve got five devoted followers upvoting you within two minutes on every one of your shitty empire-shilling posts for the last several hours

jealousy is an ugly look

I didn’t move any goal posts.

“nuh-uh!” isn’t a very convincing argument. most people learn this when they’re 5.

There is no false dichotomy here.

see my previous reply

People in Hawaii are revolting against your regime as we speak.

a handful of protesters is hardly a “revolt”, but you’re adorable for thinking “big”.

The facts are

the last thing you have is a grasp on the facts. your comment an post history are proof enough of that, with a long history of bans, deleted comments, and verbally being drummed you of most places you visit or being a toxic mess.

love living rent free in your collective heads

how sad for you

If you think a referendum from 1959 fairly represents the interests of the native population then what else is there to say.

that it does, and you have failed to prove otherwise despite quoting a block f text you clearly don’t understand— OR are intentionally misrepresenting, hoping everyone else here is too stupid to realize you’re trying to pull a fast one on them.

Fortunately, I’m not the idiot you think I am.

“records” aka “all of recorded history”