“experiment”… lmao, as if we didn’t all know exactly what would happen if Musk bought twitter, what he would turn it into. Sure, he may surprise us with the absurdly stupid and petty ways he’s doing it, but the end result is still precisely what we all knew he’d do.
eh… lemmy.world is based in the US, so they’re liable for anything that gets federated there, as that stuff is not technically hosted on their servers. it’s not because they object to it, it’s just protecting themselves from dumb laws.
edit: oops, not hosted in the US ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
a fun story ;)
I can’t even tell if you’re joking. that’s how much of a shitshow joke our justice system has become.
what, were they having a “siege heil” and goose-stepping competition that got out of hand? or were they arguing over who hated trans people more? jerks, lmao
Claim: Taylor was shot while she was asleep in bed
I never claimed this
also, you link doesn’t prove this:
If your husband had a full conversation with his mother about noises coming from below and then calls 911 and then gets his gun, could you still be asleep at that point?
and it doesn’t prove she was awake at the time, ether. people doze off while watching movies.
like he said:
getting your door kicked in by a gang of cops about to shoot you to death tends to wake a person up
what we can do is apply some common sense, however, and realize the amount of work to do this is ridiculous. and, yes, tacking the changes isn’t that complex, but tracking that many changes and storing them for tens of millions of users’ comments for 18 years IS. Then doing what you proposed with ChatGPT is beyond absurd with regards to cost, too, considering the scale of computing work required to process so many deleted comments.
so, despite how many theoreticals you propose regarding the possibility of it, the fact remains that it’s unlikely in the extreme such an effort would have been made because of the resource, time, and cost involved.
What you’ve shown is the system -democracy - working as intended. I’m not sure how that’s a criticism.
That’s the problem. You get one party in power who doesn’t like it for some reason, it’s gone.
except your “evidence” proves the exact opposite.
it’s history. it happened. Ackerman didn’t invent the story, unless he’s claiming that’s the case…?
If I write a book about The Prohibition, is Ken Burns going to sue me because he once made a docu-series about it?
If you can produce any evidence that they did anything illegal, then, yes, there should be an investigation into that. 
manually choosing poster art has the same effect— it’s just not obvious.