[-] bauhaus@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

So you’re not going to explain how you came to the conclusion that the us occupation government in Afghanistan wasn’t responsible for opium production while it was in power and you’re also not gonna provide any source for the facts that led you to that conclusion?

I never said that. why do you think lying, especially when there’s evidence of what I DID say, will win you any “points” or whatever you’re after here?

I drew no conclusions as there was no evidence to support such a conclusion.

you’re welcome to prove - with evidence - how you came to that conclusion. As of now, none has been provided to support that conclusion. Someone asserted that and provided some link, but the evidence did not back up their claim.

so, keep raging, but you’re wasting your time trying to twist my words into something I never said.

[-] bauhaus@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

so does that mean that the production didn’t happen or it wasn’t the occupation governments fault?

have fun on that journey of discovery!

There’s no wrong answer here

except for those which had no evidence to support them.

I’m not gonna send the stasi to break down your door for being a lib

you keep calling me names because it makes you feel better for trolling and bullying me, but you don’t know me at all nor what I believe because ii have said anything other than providing and debating the established facts. I could be communist or fascist or something in between, but all I’ve argued is the facts. nothing personal.

I just want to understand how someone who clearly values logic and rhetoric came to that conclusion.

I’ve said it hundreds of time, and you’re going to ignore it this time too: THE FACTS as supported by THE EVIDENCE.

[-] bauhaus@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

keep in mind that sometimes Sonarr/Radarr will update/refresh files in the background when they find newer copies that better match your set file parameters. IE, if you have a download profile which accepts both x264 and x265-encoded files but prefers x265, it may download the x264 when first available and then a x265 copy when it become available later. or a Dolby 2.1 audio version initially and a Dolby Atmos copy later when it finds one.

this is compounded if your run Checkrr and it finds/replaces corrupted media files.

All this can happen (and does) in the background and can explain unexpected library updates.

[-] bauhaus@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Newsweek is hot garbage these days

no kidding… wow

[-] bauhaus@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

I suspect it’s just a typo and should say:

pseudoscience, anti-Israel propaganda

[-] bauhaus@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

when my cat acts like this, I just know he’s peed someplace he shouldn’t have.

[-] bauhaus@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

holy crapola. sorry to hear. I’ve always used Apple TVs, so I haven’t had to deal with TV apps much. sorry to hear :(

[-] bauhaus@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

probably… this is for a different platform

[-] bauhaus@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

I just said precisely that

[-] bauhaus@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

this doesn’t affect version access, this will merely determine whether the version they access with be transcoded or not, which opens up a whole other can of worms.

[-] bauhaus@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

if you have multiple versions of a film (1080, 4K) when playing, your client should present a picker. if you can’t trust your users to choose the version you wish them to, put one into a library only available to them and the other into a library only available to you.

I wish the choices were more granular, but, currently, they’e not.

[-] bauhaus@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

We come to serve

view more: ‹ prev next ›

bauhaus

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF