[-] c10l@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago

AW2 is DRM-free. I imagine it can be run completely independent of Epic. You’d need the store to purchase and download it but you could probably even uninstall the Epic app afterwards. I haven’t tested this though, so please don’t just take my word for it.

[-] c10l@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago

Such good memories! This is an amazing game!

[-] c10l@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago

Agree. RDR2 may not be the best test of high end hardware though, since it was already beautiful on the PS4. It’s just incredibly well optimised.

[-] c10l@lemmy.world 95 points 3 months ago

Founding member of company that stands to make fortunes through a product endorses said product.

[-] c10l@lemmy.world 74 points 4 months ago

They’re also prioritising a few great and much needed QoL improvements like vertical tabs, tab grouping and a new Profile Management system!

https://blog.mozilla.org/en/mozilla/heres-what-were-working-on-in-firefox/

[-] c10l@lemmy.world 23 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I don’t mind the order of path, arguments and options, but what the hell is the deal with long arguments with a single dash? i.e. -name instead of —-name

[-] c10l@lemmy.world 47 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

This is not defeat. It’s a strategic retreat on their part.

It’s embrace, extend, extinguish. Get workers used to going to the office one or two times a week whilst making it seem like they conceded, then slowly return to the legacy status quo.

Edit: lol why the downvotes? Do people really believe “the CEOs” have been “defeated”?

[-] c10l@lemmy.world 33 points 6 months ago

You don’t punish them per se, but you do sanction them.

For example, Bolsonaro can’t leave the country even though he hasn’t been found guilty of anything yet.

Also, someone who’s been accused of murder will probably be arrested preventatively if the judge in charge has reason to believe they will reincide before the proceedings are through.

These things happen all the time and they’re designed to protect society from further damage from criminals who haven’t yet been fully judged and processed.

[-] c10l@lemmy.world 24 points 6 months ago

That’s what I said. They’re under a criminal investigation.

[-] c10l@lemmy.world 61 points 6 months ago

Note that this is not “just banning someone’s account because they don’t like it”. These are people involved in criminal investigations. Shutting them down is meant to plug their criminal activities so society doesn’t get further damaged by them while the police and judiciary work on actually convicting them.

As an aside: I don’t know why you’re being downvoted. I disagree with your view but your question was asked respectfully and in good faith.

[-] c10l@lemmy.world 35 points 7 months ago

3rd party cookies make tracking users easier when the same cookie can be used on many websites.

Firefox does 2 things to protect you from that: it blocks known trackers cookies by default; and for the others it isolates them per domain so that kind of tracking doesn’t happen. That ensures you’re not tracked and at the same time it doesn’t break any functionality.

If you want to completely block them you can. There’s more info here: https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/third-party-cookies-firefox-tracking-protection

51
submitted 11 months ago by c10l@lemmy.world to c/ukcasual@lemmy.world

Makes you wonder who approves these layouts.

[-] c10l@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago

They should have stopped at Boaty McBoatface, really.

view more: next ›

c10l

joined 1 year ago