[-] crazycaveman@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

ifconfig is good enough for me!

[-] crazycaveman@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 8 months ago

There's a symbol at the top left of the file or directory icon to select the item rather than open. It's stays there even if you have double click to open

[-] crazycaveman@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 9 months ago

It needs a catchy name, maybe something like "Texit?" Get that on the ballot, see what happens

[-] crazycaveman@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 10 months ago

Thank you for this! I've found myself getting more interested in birds just this past year, and that app looks great. I got a set of binoculars for stargazing but been finding myself using them more to look at birds lol

[-] crazycaveman@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 11 months ago

I just got Tumbleweed set up on my laptop after trying Fedora for a bit. Funnily enough, the thing that made me check it out is CentOS 7 coming up on end of life and needing to find a new distro to switch to for servers. Obviously, would use Leap on the server side, but the rolling release cadence of Tumbleweed was very appealing (have used Arch in the past, but had trouble keeping up with it...). Still feel like I am only using a fraction of what I can with it, though

[-] crazycaveman@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago

I'm interested in hearing about this from others, too. I'm in the middle of finding the next distro for my work now that centos 7 is reaching EoL. OpenSuSE is looking appealing (maybe because it's completely new to me), using leap of course, but I've setup tumbleweed in WSL and am planning to set it up to dual boot and use it as my primary OS. Based on what I know, it wouldn't be "better" than Arch, just a different way of managing updates. Tumbleweed is all automated for packaging and preparing updates, so the same issues that happen with AUR could also creep in to tumbleweed (I assume). One of the prices to pay for bleeding edge rolling releases

[-] crazycaveman@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No, I'm not. Chromium doesn't exist in Windows unless you install a program that includes it. Chromium web engine is "native" to the chromium web browser, not to any OS (except maybe ChromeOS). As espi mentioned, Internet explorer's mshtml is the only engine "native" to Windows. Just look at the Opera browser, they changed web engines from Presto to chromium; that's not using "what's native to the platform" (Opera works across all OS's with chromium, except for iOS for the restriction I mentioned before), it's using what the developers/company want to use to render their pages. Nothing in Windows itself provides any of the chromium engine "pieces"

[-] crazycaveman@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 year ago

Chromium isn't native to Windows. iOS is the only OS (I'm aware of) where browsers are forced to use a specific engine, but even that will be changing

crazycaveman

joined 1 year ago