Carbohydrates are converted to glucose in the liver. Someone who needs to maintain very strict glycemic control needs to be careful with grains and fruit.

It's not a troll. I genuinely don't care what other people eat. I'm going to talk about it, and I want a place to talk about it.

The study you link to, is comically, linking all of the metabolic syndromes to the consumption of meat.

Let's consider diabetes, type 2 diabetes is defined as the inability for the body to regulate blood glucose. Blood glucose is introduced from the consumption of sugar, or carbohydrates, or fructose.

A type 2 diabetic can bring their blood sugar down, just by not eating glucose, or sugar, or fructose, or carbohydrates.

Fat, and protein, which is what most animal food is, does not introduce glucose into the blood.

You'll eventually run into vitamin deficiencies if you don't eat anything else.

What is deficient?

Everything is in a context, I'm just going to discuss one in your first link (which isn't research, just a blog) - Scurvy. The intuit eating their traditional diet did not get scurvy, famously... funnily enough - meat has vitamin C in it (among other things) https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22063662/

Oh, I now realize the first site also lists Vitamin A as a carnivore deficiency, but also says Liver is the best source of Vitamin A..... That is .... some gymnastics there. Let me say, you can't eat healthily by just eating muscle. You have to eat the whole animal - tip to tail. Liver too! Liver is the best thing you ever eat. The fat is necessary, the organs are necessary. That is why ground meat is probably the best food you can get at a grocery store (just behind liver)

The second paper - Food questionnaire applied to a high carbohydrate population (healthy user bias/observational study)

Third paper - They even use 'MAY' in the title, which also means MAY NOT.

The fourth - is a article by a lay person.

This is the poor quality science issue I was referring to in the previous post.

If your going to have a blanket statement like this isn't sustainable - you have to address real counter examples - the intuit lived without plants, and without cancer on a all carnivore diet.

Yeah, I'm subscribed. I like the summaries! It's a good idea.

I'm not sure if its possible, but can you torture your model to try to generate a one sentence summary as well, kinda like - make a factual headline for this article that is short and succinct!

https://www.economist.com/rss - They do enjoy their paywalls, might need to link to one of the ladders as well, like archive.is

They could be tracking you by your phone number. Yes just the phone number, not an app on the phone.

If you need to keep your current number, Port it to twilio, filter out all VoIP numbers, and then forward the call to your new phone number, or text message. And don't text anybody back unless you know them.

The phone number on your phone is like a social security number, with it people can find out basically everything about you. If they want to spend enough money. So don't give it to anybody

Check your vehicle, your purse, for tracking devices.

If you don't need to keep your current phone number, get a new phone number, don't give it to anybody. Set up Google voice, and use the Google voice number for people to contact you. We mostly use apps nowadays anyway, so anything on Google voice is just going to be new contacts or maybe a doctor's office. But if that number leaks somehow, it can't be used to track your location.

Maybe there are hairs to split about blame.

But the review tells you if a game is worth buying, and if it doesn't work - it's not worth buying. Doesn't matter who is responsible. The negative reviews are valid.

If only a multibillion dollar gaming company with 20,000 employees could afford to signing to the MSDN and evaluate prereleases.

Context matters:

Taking a group photo? Stock photo models? PR? Greeter? - yes, asking someone to smile for a goal is fine

Someone just minding their own business - no, asking them to smile is selfish and just for your personal satisfaction. People don't need to justify to you why they don't feel like smiling. It's rude to demand it of others

Okay. I really laughed out loud on that one

You are 100% responsible for where your vehicle is moving, that includes any blindspots. If you have a blindspot you MUST check it before moving into the space. So turn your head!

Sit in your car, physically, in real life. Have a friend take a bunch of traffic cones, or trash cans. Look forward, don't move your head, using your mirrors only. Have your friend walk around your vehicle, putting down a cone when you can't see them, and another cone when you can start to see them again.... If there was any point where you couldn't see your friend, that is a blind spot which you MUST check.

The correct way to vote against bad moderators and community rules is to RUN YOUR OWN COMMUNITY. Make it a better place, moderate it better.

So bad moderators are ALLOWED to persist because nobody has stepped up and made a better place yet.

And if the response to that is 'woah, woah, I don't want to do all that work' then... clearly the moderation isn't that bad