[-] ksynwa@lemmygrad.ml 25 points 5 months ago

China is conducting a huge military buildup with no transparency

Is there any place that does this transparently? Such a weird accusation.

[-] ksynwa@lemmygrad.ml 28 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Why is Europe suddenly pretending that subsidizing critical industries is a Chinese invention?

[-] ksynwa@lemmygrad.ml 26 points 8 months ago

I hate America though

[-] ksynwa@lemmygrad.ml 27 points 8 months ago

Here's how Ukraine can still win

[-] ksynwa@lemmygrad.ml 29 points 1 year ago

The comment it is in reply to says:

At all levels of government we’re (worldwide) making due with less while these fucking parasites grow.

So Yogthos provides a counterpoint where a government is investing in the lower rungs of the society instead of squeezing them. If you want to dispute the mentioned facts it's one thing but the comment is still relevant and not out-of-nowhere China shilling.

[-] ksynwa@lemmygrad.ml 30 points 1 year ago

By contrast, Anne Bayefsky, who directs Touro College’s Institute on Human Rights and the Holocaust in New York, accused Mokhiber on social media of “overt antisemitism”.

Like clockwork

[-] ksynwa@lemmygrad.ml 21 points 1 year ago

NYT experts, afters firing their single shared neuron once, have discovered what everyone had already known all along.

[-] ksynwa@lemmygrad.ml 30 points 1 year ago

It might be hard to imagine now, but Mr Putin himself told the BBC back in 2000 that "Russia is ready to co-operate with Nato... right up to joining the alliance".

"I cannot imagine my country isolated from Europe," he added.

Back then, early in his presidency, Mr Putin was eager to build ties with the West, a former senior Kremlin official told the BBC.

Gotta wonder how Russia never ended up being able to NATO despite this.

[-] ksynwa@lemmygrad.ml 23 points 1 year ago

You are misunderstanding what it means. The article specifically about this explains it better:

When Hong Kong returned to China in 1997, it was promised that trials by jury, previously practiced in the former British colony, would be maintained under the city’s constitution. But in a departure from the city’s common law tradition, the security law allows no-jury trials for national security cases.

[-] ksynwa@lemmygrad.ml 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Does not seem like words have meanings. All the nuance in your tank is reserved for the constant America-led warmongering in the middle east with a death toll in millions, many more displaced, and known torture sites like Guantanamo, Abu Ghraib and god known how many more black sites. Meanwhile the Uyghur are unequivocally being genocided despite ZERO CONFIRMED CASUALTIES four years into the news cycle. So your litmus test for genocide seems to be US foreign policy despite the emphasis on words having meaning.

[-] ksynwa@lemmygrad.ml 33 points 1 year ago

Also you: https://lemmygrad.ml/comment/1081955

When you say it like that sure, except they also deny the Uyghur genocide and ignore the fact that China has their internet walled off and heavily censored/policed.

Basically they’re so pro-communism that they looped back around and are now pro-fascists and drink the Kool aid. Not to mention the fact that China is only communist in name lol

view more: ‹ prev next ›

ksynwa

joined 4 years ago