[-] maxprime@lemmy.ml 30 points 1 month ago
[-] maxprime@lemmy.ml 28 points 5 months ago

I don’t think it’s possible to takedown a project that doesn’t use any proprietary code. You have to supply your own rom.

[-] maxprime@lemmy.ml 50 points 5 months ago

You’re not dumb you just haven’t needed that use case before.

Here’s an example of the last time JDownloader saved me. There was a website where people were posting archives of old skateboard videos. There were hundreds of links across dozens of pages in a forum. All links to sites like mega.

I was able to view all pages in one document and extracted all of the hundreds of links and put them in JDownloader. Over the course of the next several weeks JDownloader was able to manage those downloads without clogging my bandwidth. If a download failed it would notify me and I could retry it.

Can you imagine trying to do that in Firefox?

[-] maxprime@lemmy.ml 27 points 7 months ago

How does that work when the super rich don’t pay any taxes to begin with? How do you tax wealth? How do you tax loans against shares?

[-] maxprime@lemmy.ml 36 points 9 months ago

Totally. The classic MBA move of firing important people who’s role he doesn’t understand, seeing short term gains from lack of salaries, and exits the company just in time for it to tank because it can’t operate without those people. Walks away with a few cool million, on to his next company to suck dry.

[-] maxprime@lemmy.ml 31 points 9 months ago

Yeah that’s so ducking annoying.

[-] maxprime@lemmy.ml 38 points 10 months ago

From what I understand CDPR purchased the licensing for the Witcher IP a long time ago. At the time the Witcher was not popular outside of Poland so they didn’t have to pay very much. Since then they made the series really popular and the English translation brought it to a much wider market. So he felt like he wasn’t fairly compensated for his IP.

I think they’ve reached new agreements since then but it wasn’t easy for either party to reach agreement.

[-] maxprime@lemmy.ml 46 points 11 months ago

I’ve seen this exact problem on other laptops. Not saying it’s okay, but it’s not exactly an Apple only problem. It’s a “let’s cram everything into this single port and hope it doesn’t interfere with anything” problem.

[-] maxprime@lemmy.ml 48 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Yeah the headline is dead wrong. Privacy ≠ ad free.

That said, paying for a service is the one solution to getting rid of ads that I can see working in general. In general I don’t see this as a bad thing.

[-] maxprime@lemmy.ml 39 points 1 year ago

Put home assistant on a raspberry pi, plug a Zigbee dongle to it, and start connecting smart gadgets to it. Or better yet buy a home assistant Green. You can check the home assistant docs to see if a smart device requires cloud connectivity to work — in general if it connects through Zigbee (or ZWave or Matter) then you’re good, but if it connects through WiFi then it probably is cloud based.

https://www.home-assistant.io/

https://www.seeedstudio.com/Home-Assistant-Green-p-5792.html

https://www.home-assistant.io/integrations/

[-] maxprime@lemmy.ml 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I love me some privacy but have always been skeptical of Tor because I am afraid that I am acting as a relay for CSAM, which, even if encrypted I am not okay with.

Is that fear unfounded? To be honest I don’t really know how Tor works aside from some broad strokes.

[-] maxprime@lemmy.ml 38 points 1 year ago

Don’t large services have many duplicates/caches spread across the globe to balance load and reduce latency? Couldn’t this be seen as a positive? It could also be seen as a redundancy layer.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

maxprime

joined 1 year ago