if it were effective at reducing industrial impacts you might be right.

theses are all in the same thread? can you link it?

This sub annd that clown deserve each other. Blocking both.

does anyone believe this is true?

there is a lot to unpack there, but i don't see the point. you said you were done so ... leave.

I assumed everyone here had a similar level of reading comprehension. that was my mistake. have a nice night.

my whole comment was a hypothetical. so.... bye.

your mockery still doesn't change the facts

in this hypothtical, those are the other two options. I would know: I wrote the hypothetical

I wasn't arguing about the definition of genocide. it's a pretty outlandish hypothetical for you to be worried about that.

I think we just have different ideas of what voter suppression looks like.

if on election day, an hour after teh polls open, everyone calls the election for cornel west, and people say "you can vote for one of the genocidal maniacs, but it won't matter. they can't possibly win", no one would characterize that any way except voter suppression.

say what you want. your guessing game is boring.