I'm sure thats what he meant tbh. But shits still funny with the responses and his terrible wording
Yeah, when I talk to people about politics, mainly online, it seems like everyone is reciting things theyv heard/read without critical thinking.
Giving all the power to people that line up with your beliefs in office sounds nice, until they ban abortions and have gun classes for kindergarteners next election.
We need checks and balances to work, and local => state => federal is a real important part of that. I 100% believe we should be taking as much power back from the federal government as possible, while still staying the United States. They hoarded power and turned that shit into a reality show
I'd imagine figuring out that "more to it" is the big leap that would satisfy the "LLM is not AI" people. Probability plays a lot into our decision making, but there is a lot more going on in our brains than that.
I'm still hoping that Neal Stephenson was right that they are also quantum connectors to every other versions of our brains through dimensions. That'd be cool
Do you want a Federal government that has control over everything?
I mean, it sounds great when you agree with the Federal goverment I guess, but people should focus more on their own local and state governments.
Those governments dont make as dramatic of TV though. So where peoples votes really count the most, most people aren't paying attention.
My Ford Taurus isn't going to get into the Uintas or Wasatch range. Getting rid of my SUV will really hurt my wifes ability to release rehabilitated animals.
But, I don't want to be a stupid fucker. What should I get after I get rid of my SUV?
I actually agree with you.
I know people will say "we were casual about it and now look where we are".. but looking at this title, I can already see the debatable points before going into the argue... which is going to create that debate, since the majority of people aren't going to go into the article anyway.
I could be wrong and there is no way to prove or disprove my belief, but I think humanity would be more united working towards a solution if the majority of media stuck to purely facts. Ultimately, it should have the same content and less divisiveness over projected opinions.
Yeah that article/site was weird. Felt really bias right off the bat
Seems like I hear about Russia/Ukraine about the same..sounds like those ATACMS missiles(idk what they are though) were pretty effective and important. It's on most front pages.
And in cases like these, I don't think public opinion is that important? Imagine Japan being like, "yeah, China is doing stuff we disagree with in disputed territory, but people are really focused on Israel/Palestine and Russia/Ukraine... let's just leave China alone out there, public's not paying attention anyway."
But this is also an article about Massachusetts...