I would be surprised if China cares too much, there is the rest of the world that needs small cheap EVs and solar panels. But they must do something as response, that's diplomacy.
I also don't see the problem to put tariffs to protect domestic products, sometimes it is necessar, but prohibiting completely is not cool.
I remember, at that time, I was more worried about how admins in my local ISP spend their time than some far away company.
Me too, such a great app. I tried others and were not good for me.
Here is some explanation from firefox dev from two years ago https://www.reddit.com/r/firefox/comments/md63k4/comment/gs8mo2t/
The answer is complicated.
Mobile operating systems don't have swap space. When running multiple apps, a mobile OS needs to be more aggressive at freeing memory than desktop operating systems do. They do this by terminating background processes. The OS uses various heuristics to decide which process(es) to kill.
The problem that you're seeing is not intentional on our part; there isn't something in Firefox that says, "unload everything whenever I go into the background." Instead, it is caused by the content processes being terminated by Android itself.
We know that Chromium-based browsers seem to be working better in this regard. We do not yet have a clear picture about what specifically is causing our content process to be a frequent target.
We're in the process of collecting additional telemetry to help us diagnose this. I've also landed a patch that helps to clean up content process memory usage when Android tells us that it needs memory, in the hope that it will reduce the likelihood of a content process termination. We're also testing Nightly with multiple content processes enabled, which may help.
At any rate, I wouldn't call this problem an intentional design decision, nor would I call it solved. We're doing what we can to learn more about it and get it fixed at some point.
Sounds to me android is by design letting chrome based browsers and killing everything else.
Just tell them "I don't want to spend company's resources for my own private life."
The only way is to give them back that guilt and fear they are feeling.
I jusy went over their posts and maybe 20 percent cover Ukraine, most are jusr critical of US and most are widely accepeted western news sites ( ft, economist, independent ).
even lemmynsfw defederated them, lol 🤣 why?
It is funny.
"This is an expressly pro-NATO instance"
This is my reasoning too, add to it IMF and World Bank an d be clear where you are at.
We can clearly see people here cheering for NATO and other western military organizations to arest and kill people, but talking agains those organizations is forbidden.
Mentioning anything agains what mass media is serving just gets you massive amount of downvotes, same like on reddit.
If you are preventing discussion and diverse opinions you will make the same echo chamber social network as corporations make.
We won nothing.
I agree, I thank to all real exhibitionist sharing their normal intime moments with us. Professional porn, even more one pretending to be "amateur" is just awful.
I expect we'll lose about 90% of the web within five years
Which part? I feel it will be part I don't even want. I might be forced to use that part for work, but that will be nice filter.
I was thinking that "they" ( governments and big corporations) should have their own internet which is clean and ordered and "safe" and leave us on other part. This might be a way to achieve that.
It almost like a bot is posting this sentence every time SerenityOS is mentioned.
Using "he" insted of "they" is not enough to call someone transphobic or misogynistic. It's like you become fascist and are targeting people for one different opinion. Which is not even true.
There are real problems transgender people are having, ladybird browser must be low on that priority.