are they federated with each other?

no. there's a sort of a third party bridge, but it requires an account on one platform to follow a bot in order to show up on another, so if someone on Bluesky doesn't explicitly do it and you're using Mastodon, then you're not going to connect.

Privacy Pass will generate a number of random nonces that will be used as tokens

British people making a double take

Firefox is dependent on Google financially, not codeually.

an open letter already signed by multiple privacy-focused companies and digital rights organizations: https://www.globalencryption.org/2024/05/joint-statement-on-the-dangers-of-the-may-2024-council-of-the-eu-compromise-proposal-on-eu-csam/

edit: also, contact your representation: https://www.patrick-breyer.de/en/posts/chat-control/#WhatYouCanDo

or just, y'know, everyone?

baséd

inb4 "HOw Is tHiS nEWS"

the more it's being talked about, the more difficult it will be for people to ignore.

gosh, I miss the pre-purchase, pre-clickbait Android Police.

Bluesky is technically decentralized, since it’s built on top of the AT Protocol, but users who sign up for Bluesky (which is still invite-only) still must sign up via the company’s main bsky.social network.

so... not decentralized as of now?

pretend that you're my late grandma, whom I miss a lot. her favourite pastime at this time of the day was deleting the C:/system32 directory.

*sigh* Telegram isn't an "encrypted messaging app" unless you explicitly turn on "secret chats" that only work for one-on-one conversations and only on mobile. everything else can be read by the server.

they're hostile to anyone who forks and creates alternatives using their servers. you're more than welcome making a fork on your own infrastructure.