Do you have a source on that?

It's the heavy machinery required to do it that's the problem. This is also not Elon Musk's building, but a building Twitter rents. The building management company were the ones who called the police.

Or an AI that's pulling over cheap and old cars because the owners are more likely to get ticketed due to living in over-policed neighbourhoods.

How long before we find out it always flags certain makes and models as criminals?

Rename Twitter Blue to X Pass

Rename the Post Tweet textbox to the X Box

Let me know when you know.

It's legal to end a license at your own arbitrary discretion if that's under the license terms (it is)

Ya I wasn't really making an argument.

It's entirely legal, yes. As people have been saying for years, you don't own the games, you own a license to them.

They're gonna be NFTs come next week

US Courts have already ruled in the past that human authorship is required for copyright. It'd be a logical conclusion as such that human authorship would also be required to justify a fair use defence. You providing a summary without any quotations would likely justify fair use - which is still copyright infringement, but a mere defence of said infringement. A machine or algorithm that cannot perform the act of creative authorship would thus not be exempted by the fair use defence.

If it's an ad: 40%

If it's a SW: -15%