[-] serendepity@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

Who’s going to assault him? The guy’s a champion of the working class.

[-] serendepity@lemmy.world 27 points 3 weeks ago

Replying to my own comment for additional context:

[-] serendepity@lemmy.world 30 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

They’re not talking about the two unmasked photos in the article. If you look at the photos of the masked shooter, he had a different backpack (white/beige instead of black) and a different hoodie(no chest pockets).

[-] serendepity@lemmy.world 32 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Kahn is the real deal.

It’s Khan

[-] serendepity@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Of course it was because of the material conditions at the time and because the capitalist class felt threatened by the rise of communism and felt a need to combat it. It was still propaganda though and it has irreparably damaged the American psyche. Btw, the material conditions at the time were not all hunk-dory either. There was massive wealth disparity between “white” Americans and African -Americans. Minorities were still fighting widespread discrimination which prevented them the enjoy the same freedoms and prosperity as the rest of America.

[-] serendepity@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

I think the Red Scare might have a lot to do with it. The generation that was subjected to the propaganda of the Cold War is still alive and they’ve passed down a lot of that thought and bias, even among so called “liberals”. Canada was somewhat (but not completely ) culturally isolated from it. We cannot remediate the American political zeitgeist without addressing this first.

[-] serendepity@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

That’s a strawman argument and a very big logical leap. If 100% of the people voted, maybe we could get candidates that actually represent us and our interests. The political makeup of this country would change and somehow you think they would still act the same.

[-] serendepity@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

Calling them fascists is a little far-fetched. Do you have evidence to back up that claim? Linking a screenshot does not prove your point, it’s just more rhetoric. Yes, we have reached that point, because it’s a first-past-the-post system. We need to increase political engagement rather than stoking political apathy. We are in the mess that we are because less than 50% people vote in the first place.

[-] serendepity@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

The USA has a very strong and effective propaganda machine in action. It uses the Illusory truth effect, suppresses dissent and makes it so that you have to look hard to seek out the truth. I would argue that it is perhaps the most effective propaganda machine on the planet. Not really comparable here.

[-] serendepity@lemmy.world 27 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

And waste my vote in a de-facto two party, first-past-the-post system, thereby accelerating the downfall of democracy? No, thank you. They might both be pieces of shit, but one is significantly less so than the other.

[-] serendepity@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago

“Settlers” is such mild terminology. We should be calling them “colonizers”. Tbf though, the Pilgrims and other early American settlers were no pacifists. That’s just the image public education and the media has painted for us.

[-] serendepity@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago

Lurker checking in to acknowledge my shame. I like that the fediverse has better discourse than reddit and I want to contribute to it. It’s just that I have been a lurker for so long that it’s gonna take some time to start actively engaging.

view more: next ›

serendepity

joined 1 year ago